BME100 f2013:W1200 Group9 L3

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Owwnotebook icon.png BME 100 Fall 2013 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help
BME494 Asu logo.png


OUR TEAM

Name: Kenna Lum
Name: Rachael Hall
Name: Michelle Sigona
Name: Jessica Stradford
Name: Salvador Avina

LAB 3A WRITE-UP

Descriptive Statistics

(Descriptive statistics for the data set)


Data.jpg



Results

The significance of the graph is to compare the average of the temperatures taken by the oral thermometer and the sensor device. Group9Graph1.jpg



Analysis

(Perform inferential statistics described in assignment.)
The temperature collected from all the groups both oral and the sensor device gave a 97.567 average and 96.137 average for the app thermometer sensor. When graphing the data collected the oral and sensor show little difference which is actually a 1.43 mathematical difference. This conclusion must now be proven right by the P-value which is found in a T-test comparison of the data. The P-value was derived to be 1.91908E-16 which is lower than 0.05 signifying that the sensor is not a good source of measuring body temperature.




Summary/Discussion

(Please discuss the results and statistical analysis. State your conclusion as well as design flaws and recommendations.)

In this lab, we compared the accuracy of a sensor that measures body temperature with an oral thermometer. An oral thermometer is known as one of the most efficient ways to measure human body temperature so it was the best tactic to compare the sensor to. We took temperatures at two minute intervals indoors for ten minutes and then went outside and measured temperature every five minutes for an hour. After that, we returned to the lab and repeated the first round of testing. We collected the data for both the oral and the sensor thermometers and compared them with the rest of the class on one spreadsheet. After careful analysis of the data collected from the oral thermometer and the sensor, we were able to conclude that the sensor does not accurately measure body temperature in comparison to an oral thermometer. The P-value we calculated was <.05 which proves that the two sets of data are significantly different. At first glance, the data sets seem almost similar because the difference in average temperature was under two degrees. However, after doing a statistical analysis were able to come up with a more educated analysis. In conclusion, it was proven that the sensor device was not an accurate measurement of body temperature. Some design flaws would be the interference from other nearby sensors, as well as the need to be close to the Bluetooth source in order to have a recording. Another flaw is the attachment methods the sensor uses. The sticky pad that is used to adhere the device to the arm is flawed in many ways. It is painful to remove, can lose its adhesiveness and is limited to only one use. In order to fix these flaws, the device should come with individual codes, or name, so that when consumers try to connect to the sensor, it is ensured that they connect to the right one. To better the Bluetooth flaw, the device could have a larger range, or a direct way of communication from the device to the recording system.




LAB 3B WRITE-UP

Target Population and Need

The target population is young, physically active adults and athletes although we will primarily target college students. The need is for a device that measures body temperature during physical activity and calculates a recommended amount of hydration the person should consume as compensation for the perspiration lost during activity. Depending on whether low impact or high impact activity is being performed, more or less ounces of hydration will be recommended.




Device Design

Group9Logo.jpg



Inferential Statistics

The Suntronic device seemed to accurately measure the temperatures when comparing the data of the device side by side with the oral thermometer, and when we found the average, standard deviation, and ran a Ttest, the p value ended up being greater than 0.05 proving that there is no statistical difference with the date collected. The new Suntronic deviced prove to be more accurate in measuring body temperature then the sensor we previously had tested. Not only is the new device accurate, but it is useful when working out and keeping yourself hydrated.






Graph

Group9Data2.jpgGroup9Data3.jpg