IGEM:Arizona State/2014/Notebook/asu igem 2014/2014/08/19: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
*All amp. plates from yesterday had growth suggesting that vector DNA was all that was taken.
*All amp. plates from yesterday had growth suggesting that vector DNA was all that was taken.
*PACYC plate had no growth. Started a positive control to ensure the competency of the BL21 cells.
*PACYC plate had no growth. Started a positive control to ensure the competency of the BL21 cells.
**Positive control DNA was TesA on chlor vector





Revision as of 11:18, 19 August 2014

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • All amp. plates from yesterday had growth suggesting that vector DNA was all that was taken.
  • PACYC plate had no growth. Started a positive control to ensure the competency of the BL21 cells.
    • Positive control DNA was TesA on chlor vector