IGEM:Hong Kong HKUST/Investigations/ Plasmid Cloning of BFP Generator Using Standard Assembly: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 48: Line 48:
|}
|}


===Restriction Enzyme Digestion===
===Restriction Enzyme Digestion==


[[Image:Digestion,_ligation.png]]
J61002-BBa_J23110 was cut by the restriction enzyme SpeI-HF and PstI-HF and serves as the vector in the ligation, while pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 was cut by XbaI and PstI and isolated as an insert. 300ng of J61002-BBa_J23110 plasmid was used for digestion and 500ng of pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 plasmid was used for digestion. The volume of each enzyme used was 0.2μL and the buffer used was CutSmart. The temperature for digestion was 37°C and the digestion time was 1 hour 30 minutes.
 
'''Figure 1. Standard assembly of BBa_J23110 and BBa_K592023.'''
 
As illustrated in Figure 1, J61002-BBa_J23110 was cut by the restriction enzyme SpeI-HF and PstI-HF and serves as the vector in the ligation, while pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 was cut by XbaI and PstI and isolated as an insert. 300ng of J61002-BBa_J23110 plasmid was used for digestion and 500ng of pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 plasmid was used for digestion. The volume of each enzyme used was 0.2μL and the buffer used was CutSmart. The temperature for digestion was 37°C and the digestion time was 1 hour 30 minutes.


===Gel Electrophoresis, Purification, and Nanodrop Test===
===Gel Electrophoresis, Purification, and Nanodrop Test===

Revision as of 10:48, 5 June 2016

<html> <body>

</body> </html>

Authors

  • Winnie Ho
  • Claire Moran
  • Mike Dorothea
  • Sharon Lai
  • Olivia Winata
  • Luna Eresta Jaya
  • Kashish Aggarwal
  • Yiu, Stephanie P.T.

Abstract

This training was conducted with the aim to learn the basic skills in producing a desired protein by using DNA recombination techniques such as digestion, ligation and transformation. In this training, constructs were made by inserting a Blue Fluorescent Protein (BFP) generator BBa_K592023 in the parental plasmid J61002-BBa_J23110.

The original plasmid containing the promoter was digested using SpeI and PstI-HF restriction enzymes, while the original plasmid containing the BFP generator was digested using XbaI and PstI-HF. As a result, five different possible constructs might be produced: the desired construct, a construct with the wrong insert orientation, a construct with two backbones, a construct with two inserts and plasmids that are self-ligated.

Hence, this investigation will explore on methods that can help investigators identify candidate colonies which contain the desired sequence/construct and separate them from the rest. Colony PCR was chosen for colony identification after ligation and transformation. To distinguish the orientation of plasmid cloning, the primers VR and VF2 (which have opposite orientations) were used. Once the PCR products (in the form of amplified, transformed plasmids) were run in gel electrophoresis, the candidates showing the expected band size were concluded to have the desired construct (J61002-BBa_J23110-BBa_K592023). These particular candidates were then inoculated.

Introduction

By using BioBricks Standard Assembly, we can assemble two BioBricks containing our desired parts into the same plasmid, this can then be transformed into a cell and cloned to obtain our desired results. The objective of our project was to create a recombinant cell containing a BFP generator from the BioBricks BBa_J23110 and BBa_K592023. BBa_J23110 is a constitutive promoter, and BBa_K592023 is an intermediate containing a BBa_K592100 Blue Fluorescent Protein and a BBa_B0032 RBS. After combining the two BioBricks by restriction digestion and ligation, then transforming the recombinant plasmid into the cell, blue fluorescent protein producing E. Coli could be obtained. The details of the BioBricks used are shown in Table 1. BioBricks used in this investigation.

Methods and Materials

BioBricks

Table 1. BioBricks used in this investigation.

BioBricks Size (bp) Plasmid Description
BBa_J23110 35 pSB1A2 RFP Producing Constitutive Promoter
Bba_K592023 771 pSB3K3 RBS (BBa_B0032) and BFP CDS (BBa_K592100)

=Restriction Enzyme Digestion

J61002-BBa_J23110 was cut by the restriction enzyme SpeI-HF and PstI-HF and serves as the vector in the ligation, while pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 was cut by XbaI and PstI and isolated as an insert. 300ng of J61002-BBa_J23110 plasmid was used for digestion and 500ng of pSB3K3-BBa_K592023 plasmid was used for digestion. The volume of each enzyme used was 0.2μL and the buffer used was CutSmart. The temperature for digestion was 37°C and the digestion time was 1 hour 30 minutes.

Gel Electrophoresis, Purification, and Nanodrop Test

Gel Electrophoresis was performed for 30 minutes using 1% agarose gel. The voltage used was 130V and current used was 400mA. The expected bands were 2726bp for J61002-BBa_J23110 and 771bp for BBa_K592023. After the gel photo was obtained, desired band was taken and purified according to the protocol. The purified band then tested for its concentration and protein and salt contamination by using Nanodrop machine.

Ligation

0.5μL of T4 DNA Ligase was used to ligate J61002-BBa_J23110 with BBa_K592023. The proportion amount of backbone (J61002-BBa_J23110) to amount of insert (BBa_K592023) is 1 to 3.

Transformation

10μLof ligated product was inserted into 50μL of competent cell and put into ice for 20 minutes. After 20 minutes, heat shock and cold shock were performed. After undergo these processes, 1000μL of LB was added into the tube, and the tube was centrifuged for 2 minutes on 6500rpm.

Incubation

Two plates of agar containing the AMP antibiotics were taken out from the fridge, and the transformed bacteria containing the desired plasmid were spreaded on the plates. These plates were incubated overnight.
After colonies were cloned, some of the bacteria were taken as samples for PCR and streaked on new compartmentalized plates that served as back up for another PCR.

Colony PCR

First, mastermix containing 20 folds of 2μL of 10X ThermoPol buffer, 0.5μL of 10mM dNTPs, 0.5μL of VF2 as foward primer and VR as reverse primer, 0.15μL of Taq DNA Polymerase, and 14.35μL of ddH2O. The first step of PCR after the mastermix was added with 2μL template DNA was initial denaturation to burst out the cell for 30 minutes on 95 °C. After that denaturation was done in 30 seconds for 95°C to separate the double stranded DNA. Next step was annealing for 1 minutes and extension for 1 minutes 30 s. The final extension was 3X longer than the extension which becomes 4 minutes 30 s. The final step was holding for around 10 minutes on 10°C.

Gel Electrophoresis

The same step was performed as the previous gel electrophoresis.

Inoculation

5ml of LB containing AMP antibiotics was added to named empty falcon tubes. The colony was inserted to the falcon tubes and incubate overnight.

Miniprep

Miniprep was done according to the protocol. Then nanodrop was performed.

Restriction Check

Restriction check was not applicable in this case because the restriction enzymes we planned to use were denatured, and since the backbone is J61002_J23110, if we use EcorI and PstI the negative results will show similar bands to the experimental setup.

Results

Figure 3 shows Gel Electrophoresis of J61002-BBa_J23110-BBa_K592023 candidates after colony PCR. As seen in the picture, the target bands of ~1000 base pairs are shown, measured by comparison with the DNA ladder (1Kb Plus). This expected band size arises from the addition of base pairs of the parts being copied, including the promoter BBa_J23110 (35 base pairs), BFP generator BBa_K592023 (771 base pairs) and a portion of the backbone J61002 between the two parts and primer binding sites (~270 base pairs), which then all sum up to ~1076 base pairs.

All of the candidate samples from both sets of the experiment showed the expected band, except for Sample 2 in Set 1 which showed no band at all. This, along with the uneven brightness of the bands might have been caused by some random and systematic errors during the experiment, which will be talked about under Discussions.

Discussion

As expected, the plasmid containing BFP generator produced blue colour under UV light. However, there were a couple of failures in the PCR step. On the third time of doing the PCR, bands containing colonies with blue colour appeared on the gel. This indicates that there is a high probability the candidates from the PCR are in fact correct. There are some probable reasons as to why the PCR was not successful. The first reason is there were too many cells in the samples so the gel could not run properly. The second reason is human error when mixing the master mix. The third one is that not enough Taq polymerase was added.


Improvements

The process of making the master mix must be done carefully to reduce the chance of failure, and sufficient Taq polymerase should be added overtime when doing the PCR. Proper restriction check and sequencing should be done to further verify the candidates.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the BFP producing E. coli was successfully created. The compositions of each process must be precise and exact so the desired result can be obtained.