BME100 f2015:Group5 8amL3
BME 100 Fall 2015 | Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help | ||||
OUR TEAMLAB 3A WRITE-UPDescriptive StatisticsResultsThe paired T-test for the heart rate value was rendered insignificant. The value was 0.098 which is more than the excepted 0.05. The data for the temperature readings on the spree device was also rendered insignificant. The T-test values for the temperature was 0.63 which higher than the excepted range therefore the temperature recorded for the Spree device shows no direct correlation to the gold standard.
AnalysisOverall, the results failed for this experiment.
Summary/DiscussionOverall, the data for both the temperature and the heart rate readings for the Spree device when compared to the Gold Standard was not significant when paired with a T-test. There was some potential error that could have contributed to these results. The first problem was that the thermometer used for the gold standard sometime misread the temperature of the user. The second problem was that the batteries had to be changed in the pulse oximeter halfway through the experiment. The user had to stand still for the period of time while the batteries were changed. Overall, with the other readings, the data still had significant deviation and was irrelevant.
LAB 3B WRITE-UPTarget Population and NeedTarget Population: Needs Assessment: Problem Understanding Form: The engineering requirements are… https://www.foodallergy.org/facts-and-stats
Device Design
Inferential Statistics
Graph
|