BME100 f2015:Group14 8amL2

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Owwnotebook icon.png BME 100 Fall 2015 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help
BME494 Asu logo.png


OUR TEAM

Name: Morgan Cobban
Name: Cara Beauvais
Name: Zachary Smith
Name: Jon Talos
Name: Ryan Bartholomew
Name: Jared Johns

LAB 2 WRITE-UP

Descriptive Statistics

Experiment 1 (Humans)

  • 0mg

Average: 3.834 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 1.52301018 pg/ml
Count: 10
Standard error: 0.4816181 pg/ml

  • 5mg

Average: 8.932 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 1.59393155 pg/ml
Count: 10
Standard error: 0.50404541 pg/ml

  • 10mg

Average: 61.622 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 30.1106939 pg/ml
Count: 10
Standard error: 9.52183745 pg/ml

  • 15mg

Average: 657.941 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 212.942976 pg/ml
Count: 10
Standard error: 67.3384817 pg/ml

Experiment 2 (Rats)

  • 0mg

Average: 10.516 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 2.2255516117 pg/ml
Count: 5
Standard error: 0.995296941 pg/ml

  • 10mg

Average: 11.112 pg/ml
Standard Deviation: 7.402885924 pg/ml
Count: 5
Standard error: 3.31067123 pg/ml



Inferential Statistics

Experiment 1 (Humans)
Explanation: We chose to utilize an ANOVA for this data set, because there were more than two groups being tested.
0mg v. 5mg
T-Test: 8.60E-7
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

5mg v. 10mg
T-Test: 3.02E-5
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

10mg v. 15mg
T-Test: 6.48E-8
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

0mg v. 10mg
T-Test: 9.94E-6
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

0mg v. 15mg
T-Test: 1.39E-8
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

5mg v. 15mg
T-Test: 1.57E-8
Adjusted P-Value: 8.33E-3
Significant: Yes

Humans graph lab 2.jpg


Experiment 2 (Rats)
Explanation: We chose to utilize the unpaired T-Test, because we where looking to determine whether there was a significant statistical difference between two completely separate data sets.
P= 0.87
13% Confidence



Rats graph lab 2.jpg


Summary/Discussion

  • Human

The human experiment showed that as dosage was increased the inflammotin increased as well. However, the variability also increased as dosage increased. All trials were declared statistically significant.

  • Rats

Our data for rats showed very poor yields. We received a 13% confidence from our T-test, which is very bad. When experimenting we aim for 95% therefore our data was not statistically significant. Some potentially sources of error include our smaller number of subjects and our drastic change in dosages without intermediate dosages.


Overall, even though there was no clear response in rats most likely due to the smaller sample sizes and lack of intermediary dosses, the human tests displayed a significant increase in the amount of inflammotin produced.