IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(33 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[IGEM:Melbourne/2008|Return to Melbourne Homepage]] | [[IGEM:Melbourne/2008| Return to Melbourne Homepage]] | ||
== '''FINAL''' == | == '''FINAL'''== | ||
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ ETHZ 2007]'' | |||
*Good | |||
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page | |||
*** i like this very much, especially how it scrolls automatically to the corresponding section on the page -''Sh'' | |||
*** we could also have "Go to Top of page" links on long pages | |||
** ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage | |||
** Vistor count at the bottom of the page | |||
** Nice meet the team page | |||
'' | *Not so good | ||
** First page too dense | |||
** Agreed, provide a little information and then link to a more heavy page - ''St'' | |||
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard Harvard 2007]'' | |||
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications) -''Sh'' | |||
* No navigation/signposting though -''St'' | |||
* Does link to detailed wiki, but all the way down the bottom - ''St'' | |||
* Contents good, but don't like their 1-page style. - ''Di'' | |||
* | ''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC UC Berkeley 2007]'' | ||
* Very good explanation of project and reasons for it right up the top - ''St'' | |||
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results) -''Sh'' | |||
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page? | |||
* icons again!! | |||
* colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough | |||
* i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ... | |||
** Animation of the "Clock" in action for our front page? (Like in the presentation?) - ''St'' | |||
* Very good in general. The style fits well under the general "theme" of iGEM. Precise and straight forward way of explaining their work. - ''Di'' | |||
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006 Chiba 2006]'' | |||
* nice sort of layout on the front page | |||
* well-structured web pages. easy to understand the purpose of their site and work they have done. a bit dislike their cartoonish feature. - ''Di'' | |||
* | ''Cambridge 2006'' | ||
- | * [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006 icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though | ||
* Again, too dense to read all at once. - ''St'' | |||
- | ''Imperial 2006'' | ||
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006 interesting process flow chart on front page ] | |||
* very very good at colums | |||
* Nice and clear overview of their project and achievement. Well structured. - ''Di'' | |||
''Imperial 2007'' | |||
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial really good tabs on the top of the page] | |||
* separate wet lab/dry lab sections -''Sh'' | |||
* | ''Glasgow'' | ||
** | *[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Glasgow nice and simple front page] ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :) | ||
** Seconded. This is about what we want for a front page (except prettier). - ''St'' | |||
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana Ljubljana]'' | |||
* columned layout | |||
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations... | |||
** Animations good for explaining a lot of information in an easy to understand manner. - ''St'' | |||
* visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom | |||
* very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p | |||
* Looks like a business website on the general appearance, but animation of explaination is good. - ''Di'' | |||
== '''PRE''' == | == '''PRE''' == | ||
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007 Brown 2007]'' | |||
* Border around front page? | * Border around front page? | ||
* Public page - www.brownigem.com - | * Public page - www.brownigem.com - | ||
Line 45: | Line 76: | ||
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2007 Harvard 2007]'' | |||
* Good layout | * Good layout | ||
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff | * Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff | ||
* Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good | * Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good -''Sh'' | ||
** | ** but probably better to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s (to avoid redundancy) | ||
* | |||
** | * a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub | ||
''Imperial 2007'' | |||
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007 breaking news section] just make it red ;) | |||
''Brown 2006'' | |||
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006 concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc) | |||
''Alberta 2007'' | |||
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg wow they used a gantt chart ] | |||
''Harvard 2006'' | |||
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006 for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?] | |||
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' == | |||
*team photo somewhere on both | |||
*photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic | |||
*border design? | |||
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06) | |||
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/University_of_Calgary_2006 calagary 06] nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;) | |||
* indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles | |||
* poster design mini-team and section on the wiki... | |||
* archive section | |||
* | *Final | ||
** Front page small and succinct with lots of pictures | |||
** Animation very good idea | |||
** Medium level of detail on Final wiki, links to appropriate page of pre wiki for further detail |
Latest revision as of 20:41, 1 May 2008
FINAL
- Good
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- i like this very much, especially how it scrolls automatically to the corresponding section on the page -Sh
- we could also have "Go to Top of page" links on long pages
- ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
- Vistor count at the bottom of the page
- Nice meet the team page
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- Not so good
- First page too dense
- Agreed, provide a little information and then link to a more heavy page - St
- Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications) -Sh
- No navigation/signposting though -St
- Does link to detailed wiki, but all the way down the bottom - St
- Contents good, but don't like their 1-page style. - Di
- Very good explanation of project and reasons for it right up the top - St
- Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results) -Sh
- Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
- icons again!!
- colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough
- i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...
- Animation of the "Clock" in action for our front page? (Like in the presentation?) - St
- Very good in general. The style fits well under the general "theme" of iGEM. Precise and straight forward way of explaining their work. - Di
- nice sort of layout on the front page
- well-structured web pages. easy to understand the purpose of their site and work they have done. a bit dislike their cartoonish feature. - Di
Cambridge 2006
- icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
- Again, too dense to read all at once. - St
Imperial 2006
- interesting process flow chart on front page
- very very good at colums
- Nice and clear overview of their project and achievement. Well structured. - Di
Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page
- separate wet lab/dry lab sections -Sh
Glasgow
- nice and simple front page ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)
- Seconded. This is about what we want for a front page (except prettier). - St
- columned layout
- animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...
- Animations good for explaining a lot of information in an easy to understand manner. - St
- visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
- very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p
- Looks like a business website on the general appearance, but animation of explaination is good. - Di
PRE
- Border around front page?
- Public page - www.brownigem.com -
- They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
- Good layout
- Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
- Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good -Sh
- but probably better to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s (to avoid redundancy)
- a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub
Imperial 2007
- breaking news section just make it red ;)
Brown 2006
- concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
Alberta 2007
Harvard 2006
GENERAL IDEAS
- team photo somewhere on both
- photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
- border design?
- presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
- calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
- indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
- poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
- archive section
- Final
- Front page small and succinct with lots of pictures
- Animation very good idea
- Medium level of detail on Final wiki, links to appropriate page of pre wiki for further detail