Difference between revisions of "IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 15: Line 15:
  
  
Harvard 2007
+
''Harvard 2007''
 
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
 
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
  
  
UC Berkeley 2007
+
''UC Berkeley 2007''
  
 
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
 
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
Line 25: Line 25:
  
  
===Chiba 2006===
+
''Chiba 2006''
 
 
 
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
 
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
  
Line 32: Line 31:
 
== '''PRE''' ==
 
== '''PRE''' ==
  
 
+
''Brown 2007''
===Brown 2007===
 
 
 
* Border around front page?  
 
* Border around front page?  
 
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
 
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
 
** They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
 
** They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
  
 
+
''Harvard 2007''
===Harvard 2007===
 
 
 
* Good layout  
 
* Good layout  
 
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
 
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
Line 49: Line 44:
 
**could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
 
**could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
  
 
+
''Imperial 2007''
===Imperial 2007===
 
 
 
 
*breaking news section
 
*breaking news section
  
 
+
''Brown 2006''
 
 
 
 
===Brown 2006===
 
 
 
 
*concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
 
*concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
 
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
 
  
 
*team photo somewhere on both
 
*team photo somewhere on both

Revision as of 01:00, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page


PRE

Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?

Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
    • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
    • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.

Imperial 2007

  • breaking news section

Brown 2006

  • concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)


GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)