User:Daniel Mietchen/Notebook/Open Science/2011/02/06

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search
What would science look like if it were open? Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Backup copy of notes on breakthroughs of the year 2010 in open science

Below the line, I am pasting in the notes I had taken in preparation for the post inviting votes on a number of candidates for these breakthroughs. When drafting that post, the Etherpad containing these notes was not accessible, so I had to write from memory, and missed a number of potential candidates I might otherwise have included, namely the abandonment of supplementary materials at the Journal of Neuroscience, the publishing of science by kids, and WebmedCentral for doing away entirely with pre-publication peer review."

For discussion, see For background:

Start out with a follow-up on last year's winners (PLoS ALM and Polymath) - ALM:

   inspired Altmetrics (see below)

- Polymath:
   but also and

Positive breakthroughs: - Altmetrics manifesto:

- Open Data Awards: (see also ) - GeneWiki gets NIH support: - Google Wave lives on as Apache Wave: - Mandatory open data in ecology and evolution:

- Journal of Neuroscience abolishes Supplementary Materials

   comment at and and plus links therein

- Pepsigate shifts the science blogging landscape: and - Panton Principles:

- Is PLoS ONE now the largest journal by number of annually published articles?

- Launch of Science 3.0, an open-source-based online platform for open science:

   "Science 2.0" is trademarked, thus blocking the launch under the originally intended name (cf. )
   also mention science blog aggregator and CC0 RDF hosting

- Science Commons Symposium Pacific Northwest - possibly the first conference with more online than on-spot attendance (ca. 400 vs. 70)   

- OSTR.CC, The Open Science Tracker, gets funded

- Launch of as a platform for public post-publication peer review - Fully XML-based journal workflow: - Kids publishing science:

Google Fusion Tables


- "the year open data went mainstream" (Rufus Pollock somewhen into ) - Citizen science - Microfinancing for science gains ground


- Access to the scientific literature - Access to scientific data - Access to scientific metadata - Access to scientific code - Access to scientific tools, protocols and materials - Access to scientific conferences - Access to research funding - Access to educational resources - Microfinancing for research funding - Transparency in research funding - Post-publication peer review - Science blogging - Citizen science - Uptake of web-based scientific collaboration - Automation of web-based science - Measuring research impact Not included but possibly of interest: - Open Science Summit:

- BMC draft position statement on Open Data:

   see BMC Research Notes entry below, and Open Data Awards

- Rejection of (drafted completely in the open a year earlier)

   check out to what extent and can make up for that

- Cablegate keeps openness in the focus of the public attention and

- BMC Research Notes begins Best Practices in Data Standardization, Sharing and Publication series:

   see BMC draft position statement on Open Data above, and Open Data Awards

- Launch of Nature Communications:

   was already included 2009

- launched in January

   not science per se, but important as a sociocultural background for open science

- NASA arsenic bacteria post-publication peer review: and - Launch of Open Research Computation:

   perhaps better for 2011

Personal tools