Pecinka lab:Research
From OpenWetWare
(Difference between revisions)
Current revision (05:05, 1 October 2012) (view source) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The goal of Pecinka lab is to expand knowledge on the molecular basis of mechanisms shaping plant genomes. | The goal of Pecinka lab is to expand knowledge on the molecular basis of mechanisms shaping plant genomes. | ||
| - | Genetic information of an organism is written in its DNA. Although DNA is amplified in a conservative manner, its occasional mutations can occur due to replication-associated errors or in connection with DNA damage and repair. DNA mutations are important for introducing novelty into the genome and thus | + | Genetic information of an organism is written in its DNA. Although DNA is amplified in a conservative manner, its occasional mutations can occur due to replication-associated errors or in connection with DNA damage and repair. DNA mutations are important for introducing novelty into the genome and thus fueling its evolution but can have also negative effects. Therefore, appearance of pre-mutation structures and DNA lesions is counteracted by genome maintenance mechanisms such as proofreading activity of DNA polymerases or DNA damage repair. Defective or incomplete function of these mechanisms may result in rapid accumulation of mutations, chromosomal breakage or rearrangements that will be phenotypically manifested as reduced fitness, fertility and development of diseases. |
Other prominent force leading to potentially massive DNA sequence and genome size changes is transposition activity of repetitive elements. These elements amplify predominantly by copy-paste or cut-paste mechanisms and one family can occur in large numbers of thousands of copies in a genome. Plants prevent invasion of transposable elements by their inactivation using specific chromatin marks such as e.g. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 di-methylation, resulting in 'transcriptional gene silencing' (TGS). Since these marks represent 'heritable information not stored in DNA sequence', they are considered to be epigenetic. Lack of TGS leads to genome deterioration within several generations and the plants are generally not viable anymore. | Other prominent force leading to potentially massive DNA sequence and genome size changes is transposition activity of repetitive elements. These elements amplify predominantly by copy-paste or cut-paste mechanisms and one family can occur in large numbers of thousands of copies in a genome. Plants prevent invasion of transposable elements by their inactivation using specific chromatin marks such as e.g. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 di-methylation, resulting in 'transcriptional gene silencing' (TGS). Since these marks represent 'heritable information not stored in DNA sequence', they are considered to be epigenetic. Lack of TGS leads to genome deterioration within several generations and the plants are generally not viable anymore. | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The knowledge on TGS in plants is biased towards ''A. thaliana'' model system. However, ''A. thaliana'' has greatly reduced genome with only about 13% of repetitive DNA (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000) and therefore is rather an exception in the plant kingdom. We are interested in understanding TGS and epigenetic genome regulation also in other ''Brassicaceae'' with larger genomes and higher content of repetitive DNA. Current publications suggested that ''A. lyrata'', a close relative of ''A. thaliana'' contains more transposable elements and differs in the TGS (Hu et al., 2011; Hollister et al., 2011; He et al., 2012). Applicability of many ''A. thaliana''-based tools makes ''A. lyrata'' an ideal model for comparative epigenome studies. We focus on analysis of its TGS components as well as genome-wide distribution of specific chromatin marks. | The knowledge on TGS in plants is biased towards ''A. thaliana'' model system. However, ''A. thaliana'' has greatly reduced genome with only about 13% of repetitive DNA (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000) and therefore is rather an exception in the plant kingdom. We are interested in understanding TGS and epigenetic genome regulation also in other ''Brassicaceae'' with larger genomes and higher content of repetitive DNA. Current publications suggested that ''A. lyrata'', a close relative of ''A. thaliana'' contains more transposable elements and differs in the TGS (Hu et al., 2011; Hollister et al., 2011; He et al., 2012). Applicability of many ''A. thaliana''-based tools makes ''A. lyrata'' an ideal model for comparative epigenome studies. We focus on analysis of its TGS components as well as genome-wide distribution of specific chromatin marks. | ||
| - | ''A. thaliana'' and its close relatives have largely uniform pattern of genome-wide distribution of repetive DNA, with majority of repeats being clustered in pericentromeric regions and generally repeat depleted chromosome arms (Berr et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2011). Recent study revealed an unusual distribution of heterochromatin in ''Ballantinia antipoda'' (2n = 12), an Australian ''Brassicaceae'' species closely related to ''A. thaliana'' (Mandakova et al., 2010). In addition to the typical pericentromeric heterochromatin present in ''A. thaliana'' (Figure 4A, black arrows), ''B. antipoda'' contains large heterochromatic segments (HSs) covering 30-100% of six chromosome arm (Figure 4A, white arrows). Another striking phenotype of the HSs is an absence of DNA methylation albeit there are normal levels of DNA methylation signal in pericentromeric regions (Figure 4B). Hybridization of ''B. antipoda'' chromosomes with a fluorescently labeled ''A. thaliana''-derived probes suggested that HSs are not | + | ''A. thaliana'' and its close relatives have largely uniform pattern of genome-wide distribution of repetive DNA, with majority of repeats being clustered in pericentromeric regions and generally repeat depleted chromosome arms (Berr et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2011). Recent study revealed an unusual distribution of heterochromatin in ''Ballantinia antipoda'' (2n = 12), an Australian ''Brassicaceae'' species closely related to ''A. thaliana'' (Mandakova et al., 2010). In addition to the typical pericentromeric heterochromatin present in ''A. thaliana'' (Figure 4A, black arrows), ''B. antipoda'' contains large heterochromatic segments (HSs) covering 30-100% of six chromosome arm (Figure 4A, white arrows). Another striking phenotype of the HSs is an absence of DNA methylation albeit there are normal levels of DNA methylation signal in pericentromeric regions (Figure 4B). Hybridization of ''B. antipoda'' chromosomes with a fluorescently labeled ''A. thaliana''-derived probes suggested that HSs are not consisting of telomeric or rDNA sequences and do contain interspersed single copy sequences (Mandakova et al., 2010). Thus the nature of ''B. antipoda's'' HSs segments is challenging the ''A. thaliana''-based models of heterochromatin establishment. |
[[Image:Ballant-800px2.jpg | center | Figure 4]] | [[Image:Ballant-800px2.jpg | center | Figure 4]] | ||
Currently, the principal sequence of HSs in ''B. antipoda'' is isolated in collaboration with the Lysak lab (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic) and will be characterized with respect to DNA methylation (using single base-pair resolution methods), histone modifications and transcriptional activation pattern during different developmental stages and stress situations. | Currently, the principal sequence of HSs in ''B. antipoda'' is isolated in collaboration with the Lysak lab (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic) and will be characterized with respect to DNA methylation (using single base-pair resolution methods), histone modifications and transcriptional activation pattern during different developmental stages and stress situations. | ||
Current revision
|
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research |






