|oncoCURES||<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> oncoCURES Home|
Note: Email is always preferred for contact.
Part 1: Goals
Team Goals: to create an inexpensive treatment for cancer with long-lasting impact that can substitute current more-damaging therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation
Personal Goals: to gain a new understanding of biology specifically relating to cancer, to develop problem solving skills that relate to experimental bioengineering, to learn about the working parts that make up synthetic biology systems
Obstacles: need a thorough and complete understanding of cancer, complications due to systems, efficiently processing all of the current technology and research available
The response to this is contingent on the circumstances, but because this project is team-based and results in a shared overall grade, it will be expected that each team member will do his or her assigned work to support the rest of the team.
Everyone is free to do more than their share of work if they so choose to, however, everyone is expected to do his or her part (a certain minimum amount).
Part 2: Meeting Norms
Meetings will be held based on the listed availability. The location will be chosen for everyone's convenience, but will likely be an empty classroom on campus.
Meetings will be at least once a week, and likely last for one hour as the team checks up on each other and looks at individual assignments and current progress.
It is perfectly fine for team members to eat and email during meetings as long as work is done and the team is productive.
Part 3: Work Norms
With the unit distribution, it is fair to expect each team member to do 3 hours per week. This will change with coming deadlines and depending on obstacles.
Deadlines will be set to match those of the class. In addition, there will be team/individual deadlines that are specific to our project that will be listed elsewhere on this wiki.
Work will be delegated based on interests, strengths, and time commitment, while still being divided evenly.
This will lead to some conferences to discuss how to deal with the problem or the cause of this trend, plus some planning ahead to prevent this from reoccurring in the future.
All individually done work will be reviewed by the other members of the group. Feedback will be given and appropriate improvements will be made once a consensus is reached. Also, the team will consult with the team mentor, Rebecca Adams, on bigger decisions for some critiquing.
If someone is willing to offer improvements, they are free with the other members' permission to go the extra mile on an assignment. If the quality of work is indeed sub par, then the team should agree to rework the material and make it presentable. However, if different opinions mean a change of the overall idea, some discussion should precede any changes.
Assignments will be given with this in mind so time-sensitive work will be given to those who get work out of the way early, while dense, creative work will be given to those who need the pressure of a deadline to inspire good work.
Part 4: Decision Making
There needs to be a majority vote as well as a partially convinced opposition who is at least willing to go along with the decision so that team unity is not destroyed.
The team will try to accommodate everyone's interests. Yet, if this particular idea is beyond the preference or expertise of the rest of the team, then it is fair that the member be expected to change their idea.