User:Carl Boettiger/Notebook/Stochastic Population Dynamics/2010/06/02

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Owwnotebook icon.png Stochastic Population Dynamics <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>      </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Actually starting at Arkin Lab

Meeting with M. Samoilov

  • Kurtz Theorems: two limits, timescale and system size, often taken in the wrong order in practice.
  • Einstein-Smoluchowski debate regarding Langevin correspondence to Ito vs Statonvich representations resolved: [theorem]. (Statonvich is the more natural interpretation of the way in which we measure data to compare to Langevin. Of course Ito and Stratonvich can be mapped back and forth anyway).
  • Of course this difference doesn't exist, and nothing goes wrong / no stochastic surprises if dynamics are linear.
  • Necessary limits of applicability not often checked in SDE famework.
  • Deterministic limit often works better than these limits would imply, as the same deterministic equation arises from multiple cases
  • Hamiltonian-Jacobi derivation sheds some light on why deterministic result is more general (requires fewer assumptions/weaker limits than SDE approach)
  • Intrinsic + extrinsic noise is hard. Environmental noise poorly defined, hard to make physical. Can be incorporated into the master equation directly in a more meaningful way, still very hard problem. Still, environmental noise often not needed to capture the behavior once we go back to original master equation.
  • References and examples to come.