IGEM:Paris Bettencourt 2012/Previous Biosafety iGEM Projects: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 292: Line 292:
  |  
  |  
#'''''Collection E.coli'''''
#'''''Collection E.coli'''''
#: the team did not get conclusive results for phototaxis.  
#:* the team did not get conclusive results for phototaxis.  
#: the team showed that bacteria with the aggregation module aggregaated more then the control, although they were not able to control this aggregation: it seemed to be constitutive, suggestion leakage in their iPTG inducible promoter.  
#:* the team showed that bacteria with the aggregation module aggregaated more then the control, although they were not able to control this aggregation: their iPTG inducible promoter gave results expected if it was a constitutively active one, suggesting leakage.
#'''''Kill switch:'''''
#'''''Kill switch:'''''
#: Within 2 hours after addition of IPTG, the OD660 went down by 80%, indicating that the lysis genes were successfully induced by IPTG. However, we should wonder if 80% is good enough...
#: Within 2 hours after addition of IPTG, the OD660 went down by 80%, indicating that the lysis genes were successfully induced by IPTG. However, we should wonder if 80% is good enough...
324

edits

Navigation menu