324
edits
IGEM:Paris Bettencourt 2012/Previous Biosafety iGEM Projects: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
IGEM:Paris Bettencourt 2012/Previous Biosafety iGEM Projects (view source)
Revision as of 03:03, 13 September 2012
, 13 September 2012no edit summary
Claire Mayer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Claire Mayer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 287: | Line 287: | ||
| E. coli collecting heavy metal ions | | E. coli collecting heavy metal ions | ||
| | | | ||
#''''' | #'''''Collection E.coli''''' with phototaxis or aggregation | ||
#'''''Kill switch:''''' Holin/Endolysin system (for the reamining bacteria that were excaped collecting) | |||
#'''''Kill switch | |||
<p style="text-align:right;"> [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/photocontrol Read More] </p> | <p style="text-align:right;"> [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/photocontrol Read More] </p> | ||
| | | | ||
#'''''Collection E.coli''''' | |||
#: the team did not get conclusive results for phototaxis. | |||
#: the team showed that bacteria with the aggregation module aggregaated more then the control, although they were not able to control this aggregation: it seemed to be constitutive, suggestion leakage in their iPTG inducible promoter. | |||
#'''''Kill switch:''''' | |||
#: Within 2 hours after addition of IPTG, the OD660 went down by 80%, indicating that the lysis genes were successfully induced by IPTG. However, we should wonder if 80% is good enough... | |||
|- | |- | ||
