Difference between revisions of "User:Meng Xiao He/Notebook/fall08/2009/01/07"

From OpenWetWare
< User:Meng Xiao He‎ | Notebook‎ | fall08‎ | 2009‎ | 01
Jump to: navigation, search
(PCR from yesterday)
(PCR from yesterday)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
 
==PCR from yesterday==
 
==PCR from yesterday==
 +
Phusion runs were with the outer primer set (only the specific pair, no others), Platinum runs were with X over primer set
 +
 
[[Image:2009-01-07_pcr.jpg]]
 
[[Image:2009-01-07_pcr.jpg]]
 
*1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
 
*1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
 
*2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under '''1-6DMSO''', seems to work much better
 
*2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under '''1-6DMSO''', seems to work much better
*3rd block conditions: Platinum
+
*3rd block conditions: Platinum, with Xover primer set
 
===Rerun===
 
===Rerun===
 
The following from above were rerun:
 
The following from above were rerun:

Latest revision as of 10:36, 8 January 2009

<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html> Constants
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

PCR from yesterday

Phusion runs were with the outer primer set (only the specific pair, no others), Platinum runs were with X over primer set

2009-01-07 pcr.jpg

  • 1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
  • 2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under 1-6DMSO, seems to work much better
  • 3rd block conditions: Platinum, with Xover primer set

Rerun

The following from above were rerun:

  • lane 1: cco # 34
  • lanes 20-30: cco (18, 21, 30, 31, 32), cbb (25, 26, 27, 28, 29)

2009-01-07 rerun2.jpg

The lane order is the same as in the bullets, except for the first 3 lanes, which has cco#18 > cco#34 > cco#21

  • lane 1 (cco#18) and lane 6 (cco#31) are the only candidates for loss> there does appear to be banding of some sort > Xover primer set nested PCR candidate
  • lane 5 not explained: did not lose WT copy, and lower band not right size for flanks