Difference between revisions of "User:Dhea Patel/Notebook/Experimental Biological Chemistry Notebook/2012/11/27"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
(fix raw html help text)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
<!-- ## END search column  ## -->
 
<!-- ## END search column  ## -->
 
|-  
 
|-  
|colspan="2" style="background-color: #F2F2F2;" align="right"|[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Entry_Base|Customize your entry pages]] [[Help:Notebook/Project_Base/Customize_entry_page|<html><img src="/images/a/aa/Help.png" border="0" /></html>]]
+
|colspan="2" style="background-color: #F2F2F2;" align="right"|[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Entry_Base|Customize your entry pages]] [[Image:Help.png|frameless|link=Help:Notebook/Project_Base/Customize_entry_page]]
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|colspan="2"|
 
|colspan="2"|
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
==Data/Observations==
 
==Data/Observations==
 +
 +
'''UV-VIS'''
  
 
[[Image:UV-Vis_Spectra_of_AuADA_11142012.JPG]]
 
[[Image:UV-Vis_Spectra_of_AuADA_11142012.JPG]]
Line 46: Line 48:
 
*There was a direct relationship between the absorbance and the mole ratio of Au:HRP. As the mole ratio increased, the absorbance increased.  
 
*There was a direct relationship between the absorbance and the mole ratio of Au:HRP. As the mole ratio increased, the absorbance increased.  
 
*The 130 AuHRP solution contained 1 mL less of H2O due to an error during preparation of the solution, which may account for the similarity in absorbance peake for 130 and 140 mole ratio Au:HRP solutions.
 
*The 130 AuHRP solution contained 1 mL less of H2O due to an error during preparation of the solution, which may account for the similarity in absorbance peake for 130 and 140 mole ratio Au:HRP solutions.
 +
 +
[[Image:Absorbance_at_525nm_versus_60_to_150_Mole_Ratio_of_AuHRP_samples.jpg]]
 +
*This graph plots the absorbance values at 525nm (where the peak was detected) against the mole ratios of the AuHRP solutions.
 +
*This graph better displays the direct relationship between peak absorbance and mole ratio.
  
 
[[Image:UV-Vis_Spectra_of_AuADA.JPG]]
 
[[Image:UV-Vis_Spectra_of_AuADA.JPG]]
Line 52: Line 58:
 
*The ADA used in these solutions was pre-dialysis, so the ADA was in elution buffer containing high levels of imidazole, which may have interfered with the AuNP formation.
 
*The ADA used in these solutions was pre-dialysis, so the ADA was in elution buffer containing high levels of imidazole, which may have interfered with the AuNP formation.
  
 
+
'''AAS'''
  
 
{| {{table}}
 
{| {{table}}
Line 102: Line 108:
 
| 150||0.2473||14.6754
 
| 150||0.2473||14.6754
 
|}
 
|}
*This table lists the absorbance of each sample and its concentration in ppm.
+
*This table lists the absorbance of each AuHRP sample and its Au concentration in ppm.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Au_HRP_gold.png|550px]]
 +
*This graph plots the concentration of gold, in ppm, in the AuHRP solutions against the Au:HRP mole ratios. This confirms the results from the UV-vis that showed the direct relationship between the concentration of gold and the mole ratio of Au:HRP in the solutions. However, because the concentration of gold is being measured in ppm and the concentration of gold was the variable when making the solutions, the %difference concentration needs to be plotted against the mole ratio.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| {{table}}
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Au/ADA samples'''
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Absorbance(Abs.)'''
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Concentration[ppm]'''
 +
|-
 +
| 60||0.0417||1.1021
 +
|-
 +
| 70||0.0571||2.1188
 +
|-
 +
| 80||0.0605||2.3432
 +
|-
 +
| 90||0.0761||3.3731
 +
|-
 +
| 100||0.1041||5.2261
 +
|-
 +
| 110||0.0828||3.8154
 +
|-
 +
| 120||0.0854||3.9871
 +
|-
 +
| 130||0.102||5.083
 +
|-
 +
| 140||0.112||5.7431
 +
|-
 +
| 150||0.116||6.0072
 +
|}
 +
*This table lists the absorbance of each AuADA sample and its Au concentration in ppm.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Au_ADA_gold.png|550px]]
 +
*This graph plots the concentration of gold, in ppm, in the AuADA solutions against the Au:ADA mole ratios.
 +
*There is an outlier peak at 100 Au:ADA, with a concentration of 5.2261ppm.
 +
 
  
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

Latest revision as of 17:46, 23 September 2017

<!-- sibboleth --><div id="lncal1" style="border:0px;"><div style="display:none;" id="id">lncal1</div><div style="display:none;" id="dtext"></div><div style="display:none;" id="page">User:Dhea Patel/Notebook/Experimental Biological Chemistry Notebook/2012/11/27</div><div style="display:none;" id="fmt">yyyy/MM/dd</div><div style="display:none;" id="css">OWWNB</div><div style="display:none;" id="month"></div><div style="display:none;" id="year"></div><div style="display:none;" id="readonly">Y</div></div>

BDLlogo 300.png <sitesearch>title=Search this Project</sitesearch>

Customize your entry pages Help.png

Objective

  • to analyze the AuHRP and AuADA solutions made on November 14th using both UV-vis and AAS.
  • to prepare AuADA solutions using dialyzed ADA (the ADA was dialyzed from November 14th until November 27th).
  • to resuspend AuHRP fibers in Tris Buffer

Description

Analyzing AuHRP and AuADA Mixtures

  • UV-vis
    • 3mL of each sample were pipetted using a Pipetman into a quartz cuvette and placed in the UV-vis.
    • The data was collected, corrected for water, and plotted. Please see below under "Data" for the graph.
  • AAS
    • HCl was used as a blank and the AAS was auto-corrected for water.
    • 8 standards were used: 5ppm Au, 10ppm Au, 15pp Au, 20ppm Au, 25ppm Au, 30ppm Au, 35ppm Au, and 40ppm Au.
    • Each sample of AuHRP and AuADA was run and the measured concentration was collected and plotted.

"Preparing AuADA solutions"

  • Please refer to Kay's entry for details on removing the ADA from the snake-skin dialysis tubing and preparing the AuADA solutions.
    • Note that in preparing the AuADA solutions, the only difference in preparation from that of November 14th was the use of dialyzed ADA, rather than the purified ADA solution.

"Resuspension of Protein Fibers in Tris Buffer"

  • Please refer to Kay's entry for details on fiber resuspension, including Tris buffer volumes and concentrations.
    • Tris buffer was added to 130, 140, and 150 molar ratio Au:HRP fibers and allowed to sit over night.

Data/Observations

UV-VIS

UV-Vis Spectra of AuADA 11142012.JPG

  • The spectra show a consistent peak at 520 nm, indicating the presence of AuNPs.
  • There was a direct relationship between the absorbance and the mole ratio of Au:HRP. As the mole ratio increased, the absorbance increased.
  • The 130 AuHRP solution contained 1 mL less of H2O due to an error during preparation of the solution, which may account for the similarity in absorbance peake for 130 and 140 mole ratio Au:HRP solutions.

Absorbance at 525nm versus 60 to 150 Mole Ratio of AuHRP samples.jpg

  • This graph plots the absorbance values at 525nm (where the peak was detected) against the mole ratios of the AuHRP solutions.
  • This graph better displays the direct relationship between peak absorbance and mole ratio.

UV-Vis Spectra of AuADA.JPG

  • No peaks were formed in this spectra, indicating the absence of AuNPs.
  • The solutions themselves were colorless, so these results were expected.
  • The ADA used in these solutions was pre-dialysis, so the ADA was in elution buffer containing high levels of imidazole, which may have interfered with the AuNP formation.

AAS

Standard HCl sample Concentration of HCl [ppm] Absorbance(Abs.)
1 5 0.0934
2 8 0.144
3 10 0.1751
4 15 0.2543
5 20 0.3375
6 25 0.4134
7 30 0.4774
8 40 0.6225
  • This table shows the absorbance values of each of the standard used for AAS.
Au/HRP samples Absorbance(Abs.) Concentration[ppm]
60 0.0827 3.8088
70 0.1042 5.2282
80 0.1102 5.6243
90 0.1428 7.7765
100 0.1584 8.8064
110 0.166 9.3081
120 0.1901 10.8992
130 0.2754 16.5305
140 0.2144 12.5034
150 0.2473 14.6754
  • This table lists the absorbance of each AuHRP sample and its Au concentration in ppm.

Au HRP gold.png

  • This graph plots the concentration of gold, in ppm, in the AuHRP solutions against the Au:HRP mole ratios. This confirms the results from the UV-vis that showed the direct relationship between the concentration of gold and the mole ratio of Au:HRP in the solutions. However, because the concentration of gold is being measured in ppm and the concentration of gold was the variable when making the solutions, the %difference concentration needs to be plotted against the mole ratio.


Au/ADA samples Absorbance(Abs.) Concentration[ppm]
60 0.0417 1.1021
70 0.0571 2.1188
80 0.0605 2.3432
90 0.0761 3.3731
100 0.1041 5.2261
110 0.0828 3.8154
120 0.0854 3.9871
130 0.102 5.083
140 0.112 5.7431
150 0.116 6.0072
  • This table lists the absorbance of each AuADA sample and its Au concentration in ppm.

Au ADA gold.png

  • This graph plots the concentration of gold, in ppm, in the AuADA solutions against the Au:ADA mole ratios.
  • There is an outlier peak at 100 Au:ADA, with a concentration of 5.2261ppm.