User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/Backdating/2013/04/02

From OpenWetWare
< User:Alexander L. Davis‎ | Notebook‎ | Backdating‎ | 2013‎ | 04
Revision as of 11:22, 2 April 2013 by Alexander L. Davis (talk | contribs) (Comments)
Jump to: navigation, search
Owwnotebook icon.png Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Pretest 6

Comments

  • Coal Price Predictions (~78% up):
    • Up predictions: 18
    • Down predictions: 3
    • No Change (NC): 2
  • Incorrect Inflation Answers: 5/23 (~25%)
  • Bad Explanations: 12/23 (~50%)
    • Mentions inflation: 4
    • Just says supply and demand: 8
  • Increased confidence after UP/NC predictions: 11/19
  • Perfect confidence in explanation: 2/20

Unexpected Observations

  • Insert content here...

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 1

  • Favorable to big text.
  • Wanted information on desirable story length.
  • Suggested changing story to explanation.
  • Wanted it to be called "your story"
  • Wanted warning on how important/needed estimates would be.
  • Wanted uneditable boxes.
  • Wanted real coal prices on top of page rather than bottom.
  • Misunderstanding with prediction check.

Participant 2

  • Suggested more difficult quality checking questions. Question One is definitely too easy.
  • Suggested the second similarity question is unnecessary.

Faults

  • Question checks too easy.
  • Boxes should be uneditable.

Corrections

  • Changed it to "your story"
  • Provided information about story length.
  • Made attention checks on a separate page. Made the last one more difficult.