Difference between revisions of "User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/Backdating/2013/03/30"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments)
(Corrections)
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 
==Corrections==
 
==Corrections==
*Insert content here...
+
* Simplified both the inflation note and the inflation attention check.
 
 
  
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
 
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

Revision as of 06:34, 31 March 2013

Owwnotebook icon.png Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Participant 4

Comments

  • The method does not seem strong enough to detect the backdating effect. Updating and backdating go in the same direction in this study, meaning updating will likely mask backdating. A study where they go in the opposite direction is needed.

Unexpected Observations

  • Insert content here...

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 4

  • This person made weird judgments. Said there would be no change in price, due to supply and demand, both before and after being shown the prices.

Faults

  • Didn't understand the inflation note.
  • Didn't understand the inflation attention check.

Corrections

  • Simplified both the inflation note and the inflation attention check.