Difference between revisions of "Todd:Journal Impact Factors"

From OpenWetWare
(added first batch of IFs)
 
(added a few)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br>
 
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br>
 +
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. (2011): 2.52<br>
 
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
 
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
 +
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04<br>
 +
Chem. Soc. Rev (2011): 28.8<br>
 
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
 
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
 +
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br>
 
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br>
 
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br>
 +
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21<br>
 
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br>
 
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br>
 +
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09<br>
 +
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93<br>
 
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br>
 
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br>
 +
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br>
 +
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br>
 +
Pure Appl. Chem. (2011): 2.79<br>
 +
 +
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.

Latest revision as of 22:18, 22 July 2012

Group.png

Home        Contact        Internal        People        Papers        Research        Teaching        Links        News        Construction       


When writing grants in Australia it is obligatory to talk about journal impact factors. A relevant list:

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. (2011): 2.52
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04
Chem. Soc. Rev (2011): 28.8
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69
Pure Appl. Chem. (2011): 2.79

I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.