|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| *[[Talk:Protocols/Appearance|Appearance]] | | *[[Talk:Protocols/Appearance|Appearance]] |
| *[[Talk:Protocols/In silico|In Silico]] | | *[[Talk:Protocols/In silico|In Silico]] |
|
| |
| '''Making this revised version go live. Feel free to revert back or change it as you see fit.''' --[[User:Rshetty|RS]] 20:02, 11 January 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| * If there is sufficient interest in the community for ''in silico'' protocols (from BLAST & CLUSTALW to FBA, Homology Modelling for protein structures and so on...), we could start up a section in this page on it. We will certainly have some inputs from our group ([[Chandra Lab]]).
| |
| :--[[User:Karthik|Karthik]] 12:51, 15 February 2006 (EST)
| |
| *Sounds great! Go for it!--[[User:Kathmc|Kathleen]] 13:02, 15 February 2006 (EST)
| |
| ::Just added ''in silico'' protocols section. Will keep populating them. Further, it does appear that the Protocols section has grown well enough to warrant categorisation. Could we have some guidelines as to how to go about putting the protocols into Categories? Once we do that, the [[:Category:Protocol]] page will also be a very good index to the protocols, apart from this very page.
| |
| :::—[[User:Karthik|Karthik]] 23:03, 15 February 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == this is a test ==
| |
|
| |
| What does the auto-commenting look like?
| |
