Talk:Haynes:Gibson Assembly: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*'''[[User:Karmella Haynes|---Karmella]] 18:14, 5 January 2013 (EST)''': Please add the Gibson reaction to this page (reagents, amounts, incubation, transformation, etc.) | *'''[[User:Karmella Haynes|---Karmella]] 18:14, 5 January 2013 (EST)''': Please add the Gibson reaction to this page (reagents, amounts, incubation, transformation, etc.) | ||
*'''[[User:Karmella Haynes|---Karmella]] 01:39, 9 January 2013 (EST)''': I think this method may not be the best for fragments shorter than 100 bp or so. Endonuclease might chew up short fragments. | |||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 8 January 2013
- ---Karmella 22:30, 26 November 2012 (EST): Vi, Brady and I are going to try combining Gibson-ized PCR products with a XbaI/SpeI cut BioBrick vector. The BioBrick prefix and suffix are a convenient ~20bp long. If this works, we may not have to PCR-amplify the vector as long as the Gibson inserts have BioBrick ends.
- ---Karmella 18:14, 5 January 2013 (EST): Please add the Gibson reaction to this page (reagents, amounts, incubation, transformation, etc.)
- ---Karmella 01:39, 9 January 2013 (EST): I think this method may not be the best for fragments shorter than 100 bp or so. Endonuclease might chew up short fragments.
