Talk:CH391L/S13/Biologically Inspired Materials: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
***'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:49, 8 April 2013 (EDT)''':Maybe that's the iGem thing you mentioned...
***'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:49, 8 April 2013 (EDT)''':Maybe that's the iGem thing you mentioned...
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:36, 8 April 2013 (EDT)''':You mention spider silk for use in sutures, would immunogenicity be a problem?
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:36, 8 April 2013 (EDT)''':You mention spider silk for use in sutures, would immunogenicity be a problem?
*'''[[User:Aurko Dasgupta|Aurko Dasgupta]] 17:51, 8 April 2013 (EDT)''':How is omniphobicity chemically achieved?

Revision as of 14:51, 8 April 2013

  • Kevin Baldridge 17:25, 8 April 2013 (EDT):I remember reading about a self-healing carbon fiber-based material a few years ago. There were small pockets of the raw materials which would self assemble to heal a macro-scale break when the pockets were opened with the macro-scale break. I'll see if I can figure out what exactly it was
    • Kevin Baldridge 17:34, 8 April 2013 (EDT):I think this is the original material I was thinking of, but in looking for it I found a more synthetic-bio related material that incorporates bacteria here
      • Kevin Baldridge 17:49, 8 April 2013 (EDT):Maybe that's the iGem thing you mentioned...
  • Kevin Baldridge 17:36, 8 April 2013 (EDT):You mention spider silk for use in sutures, would immunogenicity be a problem?
  • Aurko Dasgupta 17:51, 8 April 2013 (EDT):How is omniphobicity chemically achieved?