Talk:CH391L/S13/BioBricksAndRegistry: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''[[User:Gabriel Wu|Gabriel Wu]] 17:42, 28 January 2013 (EST)''': What was the first BioBrick? | '''[[User:Gabriel Wu|Gabriel Wu]] 17:42, 28 January 2013 (EST)''': What was the first BioBrick? | ||
'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:49, 28 January 2013 (EST)''':The registry seems to be a bit outdated. It needs some serious work with user interface and curation by experienced scientists to remove duplicates, etc. Is the AddGene database similar concept with a better implementation? | |||
Revision as of 15:49, 28 January 2013
Gabriel Wu 23:14, 27 January 2013 (EST)There's no way there's only 700 parts in the registry. If you check the history on that page you've referenced the last time it was updated was in 2006.
Gabriel Wu: Please post the video you played in class on this website. I need a place to reference 'klivers.'
Gabriel Wu 17:42, 28 January 2013 (EST): What was the first BioBrick?
Kevin Baldridge 17:49, 28 January 2013 (EST):The registry seems to be a bit outdated. It needs some serious work with user interface and curation by experienced scientists to remove duplicates, etc. Is the AddGene database similar concept with a better implementation?
