Talk:CH391L/S13/Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:06, 18 February 2013

Gabriel Wu 16:59, 18 February 2013 (EST): Remove the cost and methods of gene synthesis (or just reference the dna assembly section we've already gone over). Expand the codon optimization section (unless this fits better in somewhere else).

Gabriel Wu 16:59, 18 February 2013 (EST): How does Pauling's proposal for ancestral gene construction relate to the actual discovery of DNA structure?

Kevin Baldridge 17:00, 18 February 2013 (EST):How do the methods here compare with those used for phylogenetic placement based on ribosomal RNA sequences?

Gabriel Wu 17:06, 18 February 2013 (EST): What's the oldest intact DNA? What's the oldest species being sequenced today?

Revision as of 15:00, 18 February 2013 (view source) Kevin Baldridge (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:06, 18 February 2013 (view source) Gabriel Wu (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge\|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:00, 18 February 2013 (EST)''':How do the methods here compare with those used for phylogenetic placement based on ribosomal RNA sequences?		*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge\|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:00, 18 February 2013 (EST)''':How do the methods here compare with those used for phylogenetic placement based on ribosomal RNA sequences?


			*'''[[User:Gabriel Wu\|Gabriel Wu]] 17:06, 18 February 2013 (EST)''': What's the oldest intact DNA? What's the oldest species being sequenced today?