Talk:CH391L/S12/Origins of Replication: Difference between revisions
(New page: Category:CH391L_S12 *'''~~~~''':What is the origin on the iGEM plasmid that BioBricks are distributed in? *'''~~~~''':What is the highest known copy number of any plasmid?) |
Adam Meyer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST)''':What is the origin on the iGEM plasmid that BioBricks are distributed in? | *'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST)''':What is the origin on the iGEM plasmid that BioBricks are distributed in? | ||
**'''[[User:Adam Meyer|Adam Meyer]] 10:34, 8 March 2012 (EST)''':There doesn't seem to be a standard. This a page called [http://partsregistry.org/Plasmid_backbones Plasmid Backbones] with several sections: | |||
The section "Commonly used BioBrick plasmid backbones" has links to [http://partsregistry.org/Plasmid_backbones/Assembly Assembly] and [http://partsregistry.org/Plasmid_backbones/Operation Operation]. These are very similar and suggest pMB1/ColE1, pSC101, P15A, F, and P1. | |||
The section "Plasmid backbones for advanced users" has almost nothing in i, except for a brief mention of pMB1/ColE1. | |||
The section "Plasmid backbones that comply with other assembly standards" has a link called | |||
[http://partsregistry.org/Plasmid_backbones/Other_standards Other assembly standard plasmid backbones] that list a few labs. The are four labs that meet the standards for a backbone, but one one of them (Berkeley) lists their oris (They use pSC101 and RK2/oriV). | |||
"Miscellaneous other plasmid backbones" mentions pMB1/ColE1, P15A, F, and R6K. | |||
If I were a iGEMer and wanted to build constructs, I would use a pMB1/ColE1 backbone (e.g. pUC, pET, pBR322 etc). Their higher copy allows for easier cloning and sequencing. P15A backbones (e.g. pACYC, pBad) are next best choice, if you need a two-plasmid system, but their copy numbers are lower, so they are kind of a pain for routine cloning. | |||
*'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST)''':What is the highest known copy number of any plasmid? | *'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST)''':What is the highest known copy number of any plasmid? |
Revision as of 08:34, 8 March 2012
- Jeffrey E. Barrick 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST):What is the origin on the iGEM plasmid that BioBricks are distributed in?
- Adam Meyer 10:34, 8 March 2012 (EST):There doesn't seem to be a standard. This a page called Plasmid Backbones with several sections:
The section "Commonly used BioBrick plasmid backbones" has links to Assembly and Operation. These are very similar and suggest pMB1/ColE1, pSC101, P15A, F, and P1.
The section "Plasmid backbones for advanced users" has almost nothing in i, except for a brief mention of pMB1/ColE1.
The section "Plasmid backbones that comply with other assembly standards" has a link called Other assembly standard plasmid backbones that list a few labs. The are four labs that meet the standards for a backbone, but one one of them (Berkeley) lists their oris (They use pSC101 and RK2/oriV).
"Miscellaneous other plasmid backbones" mentions pMB1/ColE1, P15A, F, and R6K.
If I were a iGEMer and wanted to build constructs, I would use a pMB1/ColE1 backbone (e.g. pUC, pET, pBR322 etc). Their higher copy allows for easier cloning and sequencing. P15A backbones (e.g. pACYC, pBad) are next best choice, if you need a two-plasmid system, but their copy numbers are lower, so they are kind of a pain for routine cloning.
- Jeffrey E. Barrick 12:19, 7 March 2012 (EST):What is the highest known copy number of any plasmid?