OpenWetWare talk:Highlights: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==New suggestions for highlights.. please feel free to add them==
==New suggestions for highlights.. please feel free to add them==


Line 16: Line 15:




==Ideas: highlights==
'''[[OpenWetWare:Highlights/labhighlights| Lab highlights]]''' <br>
'''[[OpenWetWare:Highlights/labhighlights| Lab highlights]]''' <br>
Each week we highlight a different lab, lets start from the bottom and work our way up.  we message each lab and tell them that their page is due for highlighting on week X, this 1) keeps pages upto date and 2) highlights the lab.  To highlight a lab we need, a little icon for the lab, a tagline maybe, and a research summary.  we can ask for each of these.
Each week we highlight a different lab, lets start from the bottom and work our way up.  we message each lab and tell them that their page is due for highlighting on week X, this 1) keeps pages upto date and 2) highlights the lab.  To highlight a lab we need, a little icon for the lab, a tagline maybe, and a research summary.  we can ask for each of these.




==Ideas: highlights==
'''[[User:Jennyn|Jennyn]] 13:27, 15 June 2006 (EDT)''': I'm just posting my idea that I gave at the SC meeting so I don't forget it. We should arrange 3 columns X 2 rows for highlights.
'''[[User:Jennyn|Jennyn]] 13:27, 15 June 2006 (EDT)''': I'm just posting my idea that I gave at the SC meeting so I don't forget it. We should arrange 3 columns X 2 rows for highlights.
*Column 1 - Community/OWW Highlights
*Column 1 - Community/OWW Highlights
Line 26: Line 25:
*Column 3 - Lab Highlights (we should highlight labs that have recently been published, have interesting research, etc, etc).
*Column 3 - Lab Highlights (we should highlight labs that have recently been published, have interesting research, etc, etc).


This way, we are able to see the previous highlight directly below the new highlight. For archiving, we will reproduce the "div" and have all of the highlights scroll downwards in order. This will help users and ourselves know what has been highlighted, etc.
 
This way, we are able to see the previous highlight directly below the new highlight. For archiving, we will reproduce the "div" and have all of the highlights scroll downwards in order. This will help users and ourselves know what has been highlighted, etc. I had a go, but needs finishing Jenny, --[[User:Johncumbers|Johncumbers]] 21:55, 10 July 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:55, 10 July 2006

New suggestions for highlights.. please feel free to add them

  1. ) protocol highlight -from nature article
  2. ) latest publication
  3. ) active discussion highlights
  4. ) lab highlight
  5. ) community portal highlight
  6. ) Seminar series
  7. ) In the news section

idea: lab highlights


protocols

Similar to lab highlights, we find intersting protocols put them on a list and work our way through highlighting them, letting people know when they are due to be highlighted. Protocol highlights


Ideas: highlights

Lab highlights
Each week we highlight a different lab, lets start from the bottom and work our way up. we message each lab and tell them that their page is due for highlighting on week X, this 1) keeps pages upto date and 2) highlights the lab. To highlight a lab we need, a little icon for the lab, a tagline maybe, and a research summary. we can ask for each of these.


Jennyn 13:27, 15 June 2006 (EDT): I'm just posting my idea that I gave at the SC meeting so I don't forget it. We should arrange 3 columns X 2 rows for highlights.

  • Column 1 - Community/OWW Highlights
  • Column 2 - Protocol Highlights
  • Column 3 - Lab Highlights (we should highlight labs that have recently been published, have interesting research, etc, etc).


This way, we are able to see the previous highlight directly below the new highlight. For archiving, we will reproduce the "div" and have all of the highlights scroll downwards in order. This will help users and ourselves know what has been highlighted, etc. I had a go, but needs finishing Jenny, --Johncumbers 21:55, 10 July 2006 (EDT)