OpenWetWare:Information management/Standard protocol submission/Meeting - 7/6/06: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Agenda==
==Agenda==
*'''Template'''
===Template===
**Template needs to:
**Template needs to:
***Provide Background
***Provide Background
Line 11: Line 11:
**User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?)
**User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?)
**Print Friendly
**Print Friendly
*'''Categorize/Tag'''
**Tutorial on categorizing and tagging
**How can we best categorize each protocol?
*'''Terminology'''
**How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding?
*'''Aggregation'''
*'''Aggregation'''
**How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get.
**How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get.
Line 23: Line 18:
**Is the wiki the best format?
**Is the wiki the best format?
***It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large
***It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large
 
===Categorize/Tag===
*Tutorial on categorizing and tagging
*How can we best categorize each protocol?
===Terminology===
*How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding?


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 08:41, 5 July 2006

Agenda

Template

    • Template needs to:
      • Provide Background
      • Collect diverent versions of a given protocol
      • Allow for comparison of those versions
      • Provide some sort of forum for discussion/comments/questions (see below)
    • Suggested Template
      • Multiple templates for flexibility or maybe several sub-templates so you can pick-and-choose?
    • Template Includes (searchable Keywords possible?)
    • User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?)
    • Print Friendly
  • Aggregation
    • How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get.
  • User Input
    • We need a way for users to comment on protocols as well as ask questions, get debugging help, and have discussions.
    • We want these discussions to be archived and searchable.
    • Is the wiki the best format?
      • It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large

Categorize/Tag

  • Tutorial on categorizing and tagging
  • How can we best categorize each protocol?

Terminology

  • How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding?

Notes