Difference between revisions of "OpenSourceMalaria:GSK Arylpyrrole Series"
(→The Arylpyrrole Series: Import of all the original text from Story so Far)
(added preamble sentence)
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
== The Arylpyrrole Series ==
== The Arylpyrrole Series ==
Revision as of 15:40, 20 January 2014
- 1 The Arylpyrrole Series
- 1.1 Series 1 - The Arylpyrroles
- 1.2 The Two Known TCMDC Series Starting Points
- 1.3 The Near-Neighbour Sub-series
- 1.4 Alternative side-chains
- 1.5 Other known incidences of these molecules/this series
- 1.6 Synthetic Routes to Analogs Proposed By Others
- 2 Biology
The Arylpyrrole Series
Series 1 - The Arylpyrroles
Paul Ylioja started Series 1 by resynthesising the two known active compounds from the GSK set (OSM-S-5 and OSM-S-6 - structures below), plus a few simple derivatives, and confirming that they were active. The biological evaluation was carried out by three separate labs (Vicky Avery, Stuart Ralph and the original GSK Tres Cantos Lab led by Javier Gamo) to ensure a solid footing of repeatability. The original compounds contained an ester which was thought likely to hydrolyze in vivo, so various versions of the "lower half" of these leads were also evaluated to check whether the original hits were prodrugs, but all these compounds were found to be inactive. The project champion from MMV, Paul Willis, recommended a few "near neighbor" compounds that also looked interesting, and a number of these were made too and evaluated in this first round. One compound, OSM-S-9, was found to be more active than the original GSK hits. Sanjay Batra came on board the project and his student Soumya made (and is making) some analogs varying in the position of the fluorine atom, though the activity of those tested to date is low. (Sanjay works at the CDRI in Lucknow, India, where Saman Habib also works - Saman is leading the Indian OSDDm project which will hopefully get started soon). The outcome was that the original hits remained interesting (because of their reasonable potency and logP values) but that highly potent novel antimalarials were also being generated in this class. Thus a second set of compounds was synthesized and evaluated, giving rise to several new highly potent compounds, one of which (OSM-S-39) displayed a picomolar IC50 value. This is impressive given the small number of compounds made to date, and is testament to the quality of the hits contained in the original GSK set.
It was decided to move the most promising compounds on to advanced biological evaluation, to assess the promise of this class early rather than continue to increase potency through analog synthesis:
- Metabolic and solubility assays: The two original GSK compounds (OSM-S-5 and OSM-S-6) and six other compounds made in this project were evaluated by Sue Charman's lab at Monash for their stability in phosphate buffer. The raw data are here and can be discussed here. The GSK originals displayed good solubility but moderate degradation rates. The other compounds were degraded more slowly but at a cost of low solubility. Subsequently the original GSK compound OSM-S-5 was evaluated for stability in human and mouse plasma. The compound was stable in human plasma but susceptible to hydrolysis in mouse plasma. Esterase activity is known to be higher in rodents than in other species which was confirmed using a control compound in this assay (p-nitrophenol acetate) so the results are not too surprising. Lab book page here. A glutathione trapping experiment was carried out on OSM-S-35 as representative of the Near Neighbour series, giving some identification of possible trapped metabolites, but the levels observed were not large.
- hERG: One of the original GSK compounds (OSM-S-5) plus one of the most potent novel compounds identified to date (OSM-S-35) were subjected to the hERG assay and passed, perhaps implying that this class of compounds should not exhibit undesirable cardiac side effects. Discussion page here.
- Late Stage Gametocyte Assay: Four of the compounds have also been evaluated in a late stage gametocyte assay with very interesting results indicating unusually high activity in blocking the transmission of the parasite. The original GSK compound OSM-S-5 was inactive. Discussion page here.
- In vivo: However, the two original GSK compounds as well as one of the most promising near neighbor compounds (OSM-S-35) were evaluated in mice and found to possess zero oral efficacy (Results available here). Subsequent analysis of the plasma samples from the trial with one of the GSK compounds (OSM-S-5) showed that the compound was indeed orally available, but levels in the blood were not being maintained. Raw data here.
Other discussions of the biological results described above can be found here. The choice became whether to change the focus of the OSM project to another compound series or whether to continue to alter the structures of the most promising compounds to overcome the in vivo roadblock described above.
A decision was taken to carry out a third round of analog synthesis and evaluation on the arylpyrrole series, with an emphasis on analogs a) with low logP and b) that lack the thiazolidinone heterocycle. It was decided for the moment to park the near neighbour thiazolidinones because despite potency and activity in the late stage gametocyte assay, the series suffered from low solubility. Should this set of compounds be re-started, an automatic prediction of isosteric replacements has already been done (data).
A consultation was started and occurred asking for suggestions for the ten most appropriate compounds to make, and the ten most interesting for commercial procurement. Assistance came from automatic searching of databases of commercial compounds coupled with similarity searching based on the hit compounds or other sources. The final stage of the consultation took place live online. The lists of compounds were finalised and confirmation was secured from GSK that none of the proposed structures had been included in the original GSK screen; commercial compounds were ordered and synthesis commenced. In early November 2012, the team received results from the biological evaluation of the commercial compounds (having codes OSM-S-81 through 91) and the first synthetic compounds that had been completed. This set of compounds were found to possess low to negligible levels of activity. Though surprising, the date provided some interesting insights. For example, a forked series, the pyrazoles, looked attractive but so far all examples tested (e.g., OSM-S-92) were found to be inactive (pictorial comparison). It was clear that alteration of the portion of the molecule attached to the pyrrole tended to eliminate activity (picture of this and summary of the shortened analogs). While not completely forbidden, replacement of the ester with amine or amide functionality was generally deleterious (picture of this and direct amide/ester comparison). Methylation of the terminal amide, or of the amine/amide replacing the ester, or adjacent to the ester also greatly reduces activity (picture of this).
The next batch of third round compounds were synthesised and evaluated in December 2012. As with the first batch, all of the compounds were essentially inactive (OSM-S-103 showed mild activity).
At the end of 2012 it appeared that the series was producing diminishing returns but there remained a small number of compounds which needed to be made to complete the campaign - specifically isosters of the troublesome ester in the original GSK hit. Patrick Thompson, a collaborator from the University of Edinburgh built on Matin Dean's work on the sulfonamide whilst Murray Robertson and Alice Williamson focused on synthesising further analogues of the near-neighbours, trying to find potent molecules with increased solubility. The near-neighbours were evaluated and a number of potent compounds were discovered, some with lower LogP than the first set of near-neighbour compounds.
The OSM project has to date had no luck in securing donations of compounds from commercial suppliers. On considering some structurally 'similar' active compounds from the TCAMS set, the team have also decided to synthesise a few extra compounds plus hybrids, in order to assess their biological activity.
What are the Compounds in Series 1 Doing?
What might this series of compounds be doing to the parasite to kill it so effectively? It's not clear. The original screens were whole-cell assays, so while it is known that the compounds are effective, it's not known what they are doing in any detail. Iain Wallace from ChEMBL has performed a prediction of the biological role of these compounds (as well as predictions for the whole "Malaria Box", which is a set of compounds MMV are providing to people for antimalarial screening, and for all the antimalarials in ChEMBL. Iain clustered the compounds as similarity maps, allowing visualization of the correlation between structure and predicted activity. Discussed also here. One of the predictions was that the compounds in Series 1 should hit an enzyme known as DHODH, and GSK are at the time of writing screening some of the project's compounds against this enzyme (done - data need to be added). These predictions are made using informatics - a comparison of the structures of our compounds with other known compounds that have known activities. The argument is based on extrapolation. To evaluate whether the prediction is correct, a subset of compounds has been sent to Corey Nislow at the University of Toronto for screening in a yeast-based assay that does not identify for sure what the compounds are doing (which is very difficult) but provides harder biological evidence for a role. There are occasional other clues about activity arising from studies of these, or related compounds, in the literature; in such cases it is not clear whether the activity is relevant to their antimalarial potency, or whether the compounds are highlighted in assays because they are frequently members of commercial libraries.
Remaining Possible Lines of Enquiry
Though the series has been parked, anyone is free to re-investigate. Of interest might be:
- Synthesise these compounds that might arise from the cyclisation of the arylpyrrole side chain
- Evaluation of the "other half" of the original GSK hit containing the antipyrene
- A new search of the TCAMS data set revealed other compounds similar to the original hits that could be used for generating "hybrid" compounds that might represent new targets for the series
Start of Old Text
This page contains a summary of all the data associated with arylpyrrole series ("Series 1") of the Open Source Malaria project. A more human-readable summary is available. For higher-level information, see the OSM Landing Page
The two subseries have the general structure:
- TCMDC Aryl pyrrole core InChi Key: LNROIXNEIZSESG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
- Near-Neighbour core InChi Key: JZQOEGKHCXONAV-ZROIWOOFSA-N
A number of these compounds and intermediates are available for biological testing from by request (contact information on the Landing Page). If you would like to contribute new analogs, please check the list of desired compounds.
The Two Known TCMDC Series Starting Points
Compounds are commercially-available
CAS Registry Number: 733026-12-5
The proposed resynthesis strategy for these two compounds:
The Near-Neighbour Sub-series
Known "Near Neighbours" contained in the Tres Cantos set
The original idea for investigation of the near-neighbour set came from Paul Willis and was posted on the synaptic leap.
Data/links for these compounds:
TCMDC-123563, CHEMBL546966, CHEMBL page: 637010 Cc1ccc(cc1)n2c(cc(c2C)C(=O)CN3C(=O)C(NC3=O)Cc4ccccc4)C
TCMDC-125698, CHEMBL587989, CHEMBL: 627784 Cc1cc(c(n1c2ccc(cc2)Cl)C)C=C3C(=O)N(C(=Nc4ccccc4)S3)C5CCCC5
TCMDC-125697, CHEMBL581336, CHEMBL: 640978 CCOC(=O)c1ccc(cc1)n2c(cc(c2C)C=C3C(=O)N(C(=Nc4ccccc4)S3)C5CCCC5)C
TCMDC-125659, CHEMBL528140, CHEMBL: 626220 Cc1ccnc(c1)n2c(cc(c2C)C=C3C(=O)N(C(=Nc4ccccc4)S3)Cc5ccco5)C
TCMDC-124103, CHEMBL588465, CHEMBL: 643107 Cc1cc(cc(c1)n2c(cc(c2C)C=C3C(=O)NC(=Nc4ccc(cc4)Cl)S3)C)C
TCMDC-124456, CHEMBL548395, CHEMBL: 640006 CCn1c(cc(c1C)C=C2C(=O)NC(=Nc3ccccc3)S2)C
Initial synthesis strategy toward near-neighbours
Current synthesis strategy toward near-neighbours
Synthesis method taken from this paper.
Some alternative heterocyclic side-chain ideas have been proposed here at the Synaptic Leap.
The  side chain would target ester isosteres (see TCMDC-123812) but with greater biological stability.
Other known incidences of these molecules/this series
According to this paper, similar compounds are agonists of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1-5, which have a role in immune system function.
A new class of antimalarial was recently published by Novartis, Imidazolopiperazines.
Misc papers to digest/assimilate regarding antimycobacterial/tuberculosis activity: Antimycobacterial 1,5-diphenyl pyrroles, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.06.005, 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.09.006, 10.1002/cmdc.201000526
Searches on ChEMBL-NTD reveal:
- 19 iminothiazolidinones
- 55 2,5-dialkylpyrroles
- 58 rhodanines. These do not contain any biological data, presumably omitted due to promiscuity/PAINS issues.
Scifinder Search: 2,4,5-alkyl-1-aryl-pyrrole: 77552 hits, 905 biological studies:
Obesity/diabetes GIP receptor inhibitor JP 2011184298 (A)
Related compounds are known to inhibit the proteasome, according to this Nature paper. There is a related set of slides from a company, Progenra. The lead compound (IU1, CAS 314245-33-5) is commercially available. Related patent WO 2011094545 (A2)
WO2006076202 Steroid nuclear receptor ligands
WO 2009137133 (A2) 5-Substituted-2-Imino-Thiazolidinone Compounds And Their Use As Inhibitors Of Bacterial Infection
Synthetic Routes to Analogs Proposed By Others
The CRO Asclepia, via Frederik Doroose, contributed these synthetic routes to the project:
Current tested compounds and their biological activities are summarised on a Google spreadsheet
The results are collected on malaria.ourexperiment.org.
TCMDC-123812, TCMDC-123794 and near neighbour ZYH 3-1 have been submitted for study oral in vivo mouse model. Unfortunately it was found that the compounds possess zero oral efficacy (Results available here) in this initial trial.
Mode of action
In silico prediction
In silico prediction of targets has been carried out by Iain Wallace and summarised by Mat on the synaptic leap. Detail on the procedure is given on the ELN. The following targets were identified from data derived from the ChEMBL database:
- Carboxy-terminal domain RNA polymerase II polypeptide A small phosphatase 1
- Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH)[in progress at GSK Tres Cantos]
- SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 2
- SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
Collaborators are invited to investigate these targets to confirm if these are targeted by our compounds.
GSK Tres Cantos have offered to assay our compounds against dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH).