Difference between revisions of "Kevin Matthew McKay week 2"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
(answered 1st part of assignment)
(added links)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11.  The nutrient level decreased to around 0/
 
*When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11.  The nutrient level decreased to around 0/
 
*As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased.  The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out.
 
*As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased.  The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out.
 +
*[[Image:Test1.fig|r=10]]
 +
*[[Image:Test2.fig|r=50 ]]
 +
*[[Image:Test3.fig|r=100 ]]
 +
*[[Image:Test4.fig|r=1000 ]]
 +
*[[Image:Test5.fig|r=1]]

Revision as of 11:43, 24 January 2013


  • user:Kevin Matthew McKay
  • week 2 assignment page
  • I tested all of the parameters at different values, but was seemingly able to find a defined carrying capacity when isolating the variable parameter "r" or net growth rate for testing
  • For a very small level or "r", (1) , there was a gradual increase in cell population as time went on. No carrying capacity was reached.
  • When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/
  • As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out.
  • File:Test1.fig
  • File:Test2.fig
  • File:Test3.fig
  • File:Test4.fig
  • File:Test5.fig