Difference between revisions of "IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/08/22"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
(Floor Two)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
| colspan="2"|
 
| colspan="2"|
 
==Floor Two==
 
==Floor Two==
We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme and analysed by gel electrophoresis.  
+
We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme pvuII and analysed by gel electrophoresis.  
  
  

Revision as of 04:42, 22 August 2013

Igem-logo-150px.png Week Twelve <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Floor Two

We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme pvuII and analysed by gel electrophoresis.