Difference between revisions of "IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/06/20"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2"|
 
| colspan="2"|
 
+
==Floor Two==
 
A gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable.  Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo.  
 
A gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable.  Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo.  
  

Revision as of 11:23, 22 August 2013

Igem-logo-150px.png Week Three <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Floor Two

A gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable. Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo.