IGEM:UNAM-Genomics Mexico/2009/Notebook/Collaborations/2010/10/05: Difference between revisions
(Autocreate 2010/10/05 Entry for IGEM:UNAM-Genomics_Mexico/2009/Notebook/Collaborations) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
== | ==Resending dried DNA from Edinburgh?== | ||
* | *Edinburgh is surprised that the parts they sent us on Sept 18 haven't arrived. They offer sending it again, but also including a LovTAP+RFP reporter construct. | ||
*Luis Told Edinburgh that the best way to send it now is to dry the plasmids in a filter and send them as documents. | |||
*Chris will check out what he needs to dry out the DNA in plasmids. | |||
*Luis assumes Genomics accept receiving LovTAP+RFP | |||
===Mail from Chris French, october 5=== | |||
Dear Luis, | |||
sounds like a good plan. I'll look into what is involved in drying DNA | |||
and get back to you tomorrow or so. We also have a new part you might | |||
be interested in: we've tried to make a single construct in pSB1C3 | |||
with the Lov-Tap gene (yours) plus the reporter with RFP from | |||
Lausanne. Should get the sequence back tomorrow, so if it has worked, | |||
and if this would be useful to you, I can put this in as well. | |||
cheers, | |||
Chris F. | |||
On 5 Oct 2010, at 17:24, Luis Fernando Montaño Gutiérrez wrote: | |||
===Mail from Luis that Chris answered above=== | |||
> Dear Chris, | |||
> | |||
> Actually it's kind of expected that it hasn't arrived. thy told me | |||
> they | |||
> waited almost a month last time, perhaps a little bit less. | |||
> Of course it would help a lot to send it again through a couriering | |||
> company, but, as you said the problem is customs-related. If the | |||
> package | |||
> is declared as E coli plasmids, DNA or bacteria, the permits will also | |||
> last a month, so it would be practically the same. However, if the | |||
> shipment is declared as synthetic oligos, the paperwork will be | |||
> ready in a | |||
> week, more or less, and then you could freely send it to the airport | |||
> address through DHL or UPS, but not FedEx as far as i know. What | |||
> happened | |||
> some time ago is that you'd rather declare the shipment as what it | |||
> was, | |||
> and we assumed it would be the same this time (though synthetic | |||
> oligos is | |||
> not that far from reality... :D) | |||
> | |||
> So, if it's not a problem for you to send it again (and therefore | |||
> declare | |||
> it as synthetic oligos), please let us submit the form to customs | |||
> meanwhile we wait for the previous package. In a week we will | |||
> finally know | |||
> if it is worth sending given that the other one hasn't arrived, so | |||
> for the | |||
> moment, what do you think of the declaration thing? and by the way, | |||
> how | |||
> many eppendorf tubes are we expecting? | |||
> | |||
> Oh! I just remembered another option! it happens that if we receive te | |||
> package as a document, there is absolutely no issue with customs, | |||
> not even | |||
> the need to declare or submit permits. This would mean drying out each | |||
> plasmid solution separately on filter paper. that way it can be sent | |||
> through DHL. But we have never done that before, so we don't know how | |||
> complicated it can be to actually do that, or if you need any special | |||
> equipment to do it. Maybe you do know! that could even be the best | |||
> option, | |||
> and you can send it to Enrique Paz to the address we have given you | |||
> before. | |||
> | |||
> What do you think? thanks for all the time spent on these things. | |||
> | |||
> Cheers, | |||
> | |||
> Luis | |||
> | |||
Revision as of 19:15, 5 October 2010
WiFi Coli Collaborations | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Resending dried DNA from Edinburgh?
Mail from Chris French, october 5Dear Luis, sounds like a good plan. I'll look into what is involved in drying DNA and get back to you tomorrow or so. We also have a new part you might be interested in: we've tried to make a single construct in pSB1C3 with the Lov-Tap gene (yours) plus the reporter with RFP from Lausanne. Should get the sequence back tomorrow, so if it has worked, and if this would be useful to you, I can put this in as well. cheers, Chris F.
Mail from Luis that Chris answered above> Dear Chris, > > Actually it's kind of expected that it hasn't arrived. thy told me > they > waited almost a month last time, perhaps a little bit less. > Of course it would help a lot to send it again through a couriering > company, but, as you said the problem is customs-related. If the > package > is declared as E coli plasmids, DNA or bacteria, the permits will also > last a month, so it would be practically the same. However, if the > shipment is declared as synthetic oligos, the paperwork will be > ready in a > week, more or less, and then you could freely send it to the airport > address through DHL or UPS, but not FedEx as far as i know. What > happened > some time ago is that you'd rather declare the shipment as what it > was, > and we assumed it would be the same this time (though synthetic > oligos is > not that far from reality... :D) > > So, if it's not a problem for you to send it again (and therefore > declare > it as synthetic oligos), please let us submit the form to customs > meanwhile we wait for the previous package. In a week we will > finally know > if it is worth sending given that the other one hasn't arrived, so > for the > moment, what do you think of the declaration thing? and by the way, > how > many eppendorf tubes are we expecting? > > Oh! I just remembered another option! it happens that if we receive te > package as a document, there is absolutely no issue with customs, > not even > the need to declare or submit permits. This would mean drying out each > plasmid solution separately on filter paper. that way it can be sent > through DHL. But we have never done that before, so we don't know how > complicated it can be to actually do that, or if you need any special > equipment to do it. Maybe you do know! that could even be the best > option, > and you can send it to Enrique Paz to the address we have given you > before. > > What do you think? thanks for all the time spent on these things. > > Cheers, > > Luis >
|