IGEM:Stanford/2009/General Comments: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
*'''[[User:Robert Ovadia|Robert]] 12:19, 28 March 2009 (EDT)''': I think it'd be cool to do all three of the projects as what they described as their plan to "Save the World." If we simplify each project to do a specific task but make it simple, I think it's possible. EX: If we engineer a simple PS-related pathway in cyano with a few genes; engineer a simple way to degrade plastics consisting of two or three genes (maybe in yeast?); and the same concept with environmental estrogens (in E.coli?); we could show our team was very flexible in designing and working with almost any previously engineered strain in the registry! The only down fall I see is if working with more than one strain is not allowable for iGEM, then nevermind! I don't recall any team using more than one strain for their project but anyways, I just wanted to know what you guys thought. | *'''[[User:Robert Ovadia|Robert]] 12:19, 28 March 2009 (EDT)''': I think it'd be cool to do all three of the projects as what they described as their plan to "Save the World." If we simplify each project to do a specific task but make it simple, I think it's possible. EX: If we engineer a simple PS-related pathway in cyano with a few genes; engineer a simple way to degrade plastics consisting of two or three genes (maybe in yeast?); and the same concept with environmental estrogens (in E.coli?); we could show our team was very flexible in designing and working with almost any previously engineered strain in the registry! The only down fall I see is if working with more than one strain is not allowable for iGEM, then nevermind! I don't recall any team using more than one strain for their project but anyways, I just wanted to know what you guys thought. | ||
*'''[[User:Robert Ovadia|Robert]] 13:52, 28 March 2009 (EDT)''': On second thought, it was mentioned that this would be very overwhelming, so scratch everything said above! But other comments are welcome. | |||
Revision as of 10:52, 28 March 2009
Comments
- Robert 12:19, 28 March 2009 (EDT): I think it'd be cool to do all three of the projects as what they described as their plan to "Save the World." If we simplify each project to do a specific task but make it simple, I think it's possible. EX: If we engineer a simple PS-related pathway in cyano with a few genes; engineer a simple way to degrade plastics consisting of two or three genes (maybe in yeast?); and the same concept with environmental estrogens (in E.coli?); we could show our team was very flexible in designing and working with almost any previously engineered strain in the registry! The only down fall I see is if working with more than one strain is not allowable for iGEM, then nevermind! I don't recall any team using more than one strain for their project but anyways, I just wanted to know what you guys thought.
- Robert 13:52, 28 March 2009 (EDT): On second thought, it was mentioned that this would be very overwhelming, so scratch everything said above! But other comments are welcome.
