IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== '''FINAL'''==
== '''FINAL'''==


''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ| ETHZ 2007]''
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ ETHZ 2007]''
*Good
*Good
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
Line 15: Line 15:




''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard| Harvard 2007]''
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard Harvard 2007]''
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)




''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC| UC Berkeley 2007]''
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC UC Berkeley 2007]''
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
Line 28: Line 28:




''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006| Chiba 2006]''
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006 Chiba 2006]''
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
* nice sort of layout on the front page  




''Cambridge 2006''
''Cambridge 2006''
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006| icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006 icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though




''Imperial 2006''
''Imperial 2006''
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006| interesting process flow chart on front page ]
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006 interesting process flow chart on front page ]
* very very good at colums  
* very very good at colums  


''Imperial 2007''
''Imperial 2007''
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial| really good tabs on the top of the page]
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial really good tabs on the top of the page]




''Glasgow''
''Glasgow''
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Glasgow| nice and simple front page] ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)  
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Glasgow nice and simple front page] ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)  




''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana| Ljubljana]''
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana Ljubljana]''
* columned layout
* columned layout
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
Line 57: Line 57:
== '''PRE''' ==
== '''PRE''' ==


''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007| Brown 2007]''
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007 Brown 2007]''
* Border around front page?  
* Border around front page?  
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
Line 63: Line 63:




''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2007| Harvard 2007]''
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2007 Harvard 2007]''
* Good layout  
* Good layout  
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
Line 75: Line 75:


''Imperial 2007''
''Imperial 2007''
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007| breaking news section] just make it red ;)
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007 breaking news section] just make it red ;)




''Brown 2006''
''Brown 2006''
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006| concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006 concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)




''Alberta 2007''
''Alberta 2007''
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg| wow they used a gantt chart ]
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg wow they used a gantt chart ]






''Harvard 2006''
''Harvard 2006''
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006| for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006 for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]




Line 98: Line 98:
*border design?
*border design?
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/University_of_Calgary_2006| calagary 06] nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/University_of_Calgary_2006 calagary 06] nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
* indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles  
* indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles  
* poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
* poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
* archive section
* archive section

Revision as of 05:03, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
    • icons again!!
    • colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough
    • i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page


Cambridge 2006

  • icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though


Imperial 2006

Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page


Glasgow


Ljubljana

  • columned layout
  • animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...
  • visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
  • very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p


PRE

Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?


Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
  • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
  • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
  • a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub


Imperial 2007


Brown 2006

  • concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)


Alberta 2007


Harvard 2006


GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
  • indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
  • poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
  • archive section