Difference between revisions of "IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 62: Line 62:
== '''FINAL''' ==
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
*team photo somewhere on both
*team photo somewhere on both
*photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic

Revision as of 01:48, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


ETHZ 2007


  • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
  • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
  • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
  • Nice meet the team page


  • First page too dense

Harvard 2007

  • Intro good

- What the project was

- What they had achieved

- What it could achieve in the future (applications)

UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?


Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?

Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
    • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
    • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.

Imperial 2007

  • breaking news section


  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic