Difference between revisions of "IGEM:Carnegie Mellon University/2009/Notebook/SUCCEED Survey and Peer Incentives/2014/02/03"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
(Autocreate 2014/02/03 Entry for IGEM:Carnegie_Mellon_University/2009/Notebook/SUCCEED_Survey_and_Peer_Incentives)
 
(Entry title)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* Insert your content here.
 
* Insert your content here.
  
 +
Alex asked for papers more relevant to peer incentives, found these:
  
 +
Student incentives - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574069206020150
 +
 +
 +
Productivity under group incentives - http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951348
 +
 +
1. The performance of an experimental group in the past influences the performance under any group incentive performances in the present in terms of effort level.
 +
 +
2. Tournament-based group incentives are very effective
 +
 +
3. Monitoring works but is costly
 +
 +
 +
Social effects of team incentives - http://www.nber.org/papers/w16687
 +
 +
In a team setting, team members value effort from other team members differently than their own, and team incentives are more cost-efficient, suggesting a social effect from working in a team.
 +
 +
 +
Incentives for task-related efforts in workgroups - http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0714
 +
 +
If employees are outcome-linked, the optimal incentive scheme for individuals is individual reward and in group, it is group punishment. When people within a group have the opportunity to help one another, optimal group incentives are positive. Also, when people in a group can share information, individual and group incentives play complementary roles to each other.
  
 
<!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## -->
 
<!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## -->

Revision as of 19:59, 10 February 2014

Igem-logo-150px.png iGEM Project name 1 <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Insert your content here.

Alex asked for papers more relevant to peer incentives, found these:

Student incentives - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574069206020150


Productivity under group incentives - http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951348

1. The performance of an experimental group in the past influences the performance under any group incentive performances in the present in terms of effort level.

2. Tournament-based group incentives are very effective

3. Monitoring works but is costly


Social effects of team incentives - http://www.nber.org/papers/w16687

In a team setting, team members value effort from other team members differently than their own, and team incentives are more cost-efficient, suggesting a social effect from working in a team.


Incentives for task-related efforts in workgroups - http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0714

If employees are outcome-linked, the optimal incentive scheme for individuals is individual reward and in group, it is group punishment. When people within a group have the opportunity to help one another, optimal group incentives are positive. Also, when people in a group can share information, individual and group incentives play complementary roles to each other.