Holcombe:TemporalLimitsReview: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Holcombe}} | {{Template:Holcombe}} | ||
Notes for the project described in <cite>Holcombe2009TICS</cite> | Notes for the project described in <cite>Holcombe2009TICS</cite> | ||
Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet | Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet | ||
* acceleration and direction alternation | * acceleration and direction alternation | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 25 May 2009
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
Notes for the project described in [1]
Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet
- acceleration and direction alternation
|
|
|---|
If temporally low-pass the Reichhardt outputs, all speeds represented in speed-modulated stimulus but not in unmodulated stimulus. If temporally low-pass the pre-filtering stage,wouldn't be able to perceive motion at high frequencies If delay stage is temporally low-pass,
integration interval
[2] found attention / central viewing dramatically increased motion integration interval, with max integration interval 10 sec as found by Burr and Santoro
refs
- Holcombe AO. Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 May;13(5):216-21. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.005 |
- Melcher D, Crespi S, Bruno A, and Morrone MC. The role of attention in central and peripheral motion integration. Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1367-74. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.023 |
