Difference between revisions of "Endy:Victor3 plate variation"

From OpenWetWare
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
[[Image:NewplateGFP|thumb|300px|left|New plate]]
 
[[Image:NewplateGFP|thumb|300px|left|New plate]]
 
[[Image:OldplateGFP.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Old plate]]
 
[[Image:OldplateGFP.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Old plate]]
 
+
\br
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
 
*The washed plate results in a higher average background reading.
 
*The washed plate results in a higher average background reading.
 
*The washed plate actually results in tighter distribution of readings.
 
*The washed plate actually results in tighter distribution of readings.
 
*For most applications, washed plates are perfectly acceptable.
 
*For most applications, washed plates are perfectly acceptable.

Revision as of 14:37, 8 August 2005

Background

96 well plates with transparent bases cost ~$4 each. It was unclear if washing plates (bleach, followed by ethanol) led to greater variation in readings.

Method

The GFP and absorbance of every well on a new and a washed plate were measured. The wells were empty.

Results

Histograms of the GFP readings for each plate are shown below.

New plate
Old plate

\br

Conclusion

  • The washed plate results in a higher average background reading.
  • The washed plate actually results in tighter distribution of readings.
  • For most applications, washed plates are perfectly acceptable.