Dionne:Protocols: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
gentamicin 10; nalidixic acid 20; carbenicillin 50; cycloheximide 500; amphotericin B 10. You'll note that the cycloheximide makes this stuff both really toxic and fairly expensive, which is one of the reasons we avoid doing this experiment wherever possible.
gentamicin 10; nalidixic acid 20; carbenicillin 50; cycloheximide 500; amphotericin B 10. You'll note that the cycloheximide makes this stuff both really toxic and fairly expensive, which is one of the reasons we avoid doing this experiment wherever possible.


The other reason we avoid this is because it works very poorly as a method of quantitation. ''M marinum'' stick together, and in flies at least are tightly tissue-associated. The 0.2% SDS in the smashing-buffer helps this, but nowhere near enough to get good bacterial quantitation (the freed bacteria are by and large single cells, but many many bacteria remain associated with the fly cuticle). We haven't been able to homogenize the fly well enough to free all, or even most, of the bacteria. Instead, we have developed a quantitative RT-PCR assay, detailed [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=17055976&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum here], which seems to work at least as well.
The other reason we avoid this is because it works very poorly as a method of quantitation. ''M marinum'' stick together, and in flies at least are tightly tissue-associated. The 0.02% SDS in the smashing-buffer helps this, but nowhere near enough to get good bacterial quantitation (the freed bacteria are by and large single cells, but many many bacteria remain associated with the fly cuticle). We haven't been able to homogenize the fly well enough to free all, or even most, of the bacteria. Instead, we have developed a quantitative RT-PCR assay, detailed [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=17055976&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum here], which seems to work at least as well.


===Preparing ''M marinum'' for injection===
===Preparing ''M marinum'' for injection===

Revision as of 02:53, 10 May 2007

About Us       Protocols &c.       Lab Members       Publications       Contact       Links


Setting up a small-scale Drosophila kitchen

When I started my own lab in January 2007, I found myself needing to make my own fly food for the first time. This is how I set up my own fly kitchen, on the relatively-cheap. Much of this was done based on the advice of Ralf Stanewsky, to whom I am very much indebted.

Cooking and dispensing the food

Very small batches of fly food (1 litre at a time) can be made in a microwave.

In order to make larger quantities, I bought an 1800-watt portable induction cooker from John Lewis for £60. This is basically just a hot-plate, but it is more efficient (and hence puts out more heat at a given power consumption) than a normal electric hot-plate. The induction cooker is also a bit less of a fire-hazard than other kinds of cooker. I got a 12-litre pot from a catering-supply shop (£30).

For mixing during cooking, I bought a Heidolph RZR-2041 (£500) with a PR-30 "Pitched-blade Impeller" (£25). There are probably cheaper mixers available, but this one was particularly recommended. It seems to work well.

To dispense the food, I got a Watson-Marlow 323S/D Peristaltic Pump (£755). This model is nice because it can be programmed to dispense a specific volume at the touch of a button. Others have recommended a cheaper Wheaton pump; as far as I can tell, it is not available in the UK. In any case, I strongly recommend a pump for pouring food: it makes this chore much easier.

Recipes and ingredients

I have been using the following recipe. Per litre of food:

Agar 10g
Sucrose 15g
Glucose 33g
Yeast 35g
Maize meal 15g
Wheat germ 10g
Treacle (= molasses) 30g
Soya Flour 1 tbsp
Water to 1 litre

Bring to boil, stirring constantly
Simmer 10 minutes
Allow to cool to below 70°C, then add:

Nipagin solution 10mls
Propionic acid 5mls

(Nipagin solution = 25g Nipagin M (tegosept M, p-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester) dissolved in 250ml ethanol)

Use about 8ml per fly vial.

I buy sucrose, maize meal, wheat germ, soy flour, and molasses from Planet Organic, a local health-food store. This is fairly cheap and avoids insecticide contamination (insofar as possible).

Working with Mycobacterium marinum

This is a brief summary of how we culture Mycobacterium marinum. We aren't bacterial geneticists, generally speaking; if you want information on genetically manipulating this organism, you'll be better off asking someone else.

Basic M marinum culture

We culture M marinum in Middlebrook 7H9 media (including glycerol), supplemented with 10% OADC, 0.2% Tween-80, and (as necessary) antibiotics. Cultures are grown standing at 29°C; we find that disposable vented plasticware intended for tissue-culture (such as Nunc 169900) is convenient for this. (Others often grow these cultures shaking, but in my experience this is unneccessary.) For solid-phase culture, we use 7H9 agar, but we avoid solid culture whenever possible, because it's sllloooow. (7H11 agar is more selective but for our purposes we find no advantage in its use.)

Culture of M marinum from biological samples

Culture of mycobacteria from biological samples is difficult, because mycobacteria grow very slowly and are easily out-competed. This problem is painfully apparent in growing M marinum from Drosophila: at 29°C, the temperature at which we grow M marinum, we get vast numbers of competing bacterial and yeast species out of flies.

That said, we've managed to find a combination of antibiotics that will kill almost everything that comes out of our flies and allow M marinum to thrive. We smash flies thoroughly in PBS supplemented with 0.02% SDS and then plate them on 7H9 agar supplemented with the following (all in micrograms/ml): gentamicin 10; nalidixic acid 20; carbenicillin 50; cycloheximide 500; amphotericin B 10. You'll note that the cycloheximide makes this stuff both really toxic and fairly expensive, which is one of the reasons we avoid doing this experiment wherever possible.

The other reason we avoid this is because it works very poorly as a method of quantitation. M marinum stick together, and in flies at least are tightly tissue-associated. The 0.02% SDS in the smashing-buffer helps this, but nowhere near enough to get good bacterial quantitation (the freed bacteria are by and large single cells, but many many bacteria remain associated with the fly cuticle). We haven't been able to homogenize the fly well enough to free all, or even most, of the bacteria. Instead, we have developed a quantitative RT-PCR assay, detailed here, which seems to work at least as well.

Preparing M marinum for injection

As mentioned above, M marinum tend to clump. For infection experiments, we usually want a single-cell suspension, not least because this allows us to accurately quantify the dose by measuring optical density. People disrupt the clumps in various ways; we find the method that works best for us is to separate out singe cells by centrifugation. We just take a nice, thick culture, spin at 3000x g for 5 minutes at room temperature to pellet all bacteria, resuspend in PBS + 0.2% Tween-80, then spin at 200x g to pellet clumps; single bacteria (and some doublets) will remain in suspension after this spin. These bacteria are now ready for infection. (This protocol originally came from Lian-Yong Gao.)

In future, this page will also include:

Measuring triglyceride, glycogen and glucose from Drosophila