BE Board:Visiting committee: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*First year funding/Timing of joining labs: we understand that a lack of funding is what limits incoming class sizes. Changing the timing may allow greater flexibility, but the majority of students are happy with the current system, with a few at both extremes. | *First year funding/Timing of joining labs: we understand that a lack of funding is what limits incoming class sizes. Changing the timing may allow greater flexibility, but the majority of students are happy with the current system, with a few at both extremes. | ||
*Rotations: Overwhelmingly against required rotations, although the option would be appreciated by some. IAP would be a possible time for rotations. | *Rotations: Overwhelmingly against required rotations, although the option would be appreciated by some. IAP would be a possible time for rotations. | ||
*Process: Students would appreciate a list of available faculty (those who have space), but are otherwise happy with the process. | *Process: Students would appreciate a list of available faculty (those who have space), but are otherwise happy with the process. Morning preview seminars are especially helpful. | ||
===Facilities (Nate & Maxine)=== | ===Facilities (Nate & Maxine)=== |
Revision as of 09:19, 18 April 2006
For current website see begradboard.mit.edu
Student opinionPeople
Topic AreasAdd, subtract as you see fit Curriculum
Advisor Selection Process (Diana)
Facilities (Nate & Maxine)
Career Development (Nate, Jordan)
Undergraduate Major (Amy)
concepts?
seminar-type forum?) to provide the opportunity for members of the BE community to provide initial feedback on the undergraduate curriculum. Thesis Mentoring (Diana, Danielle)
Faculty Research DirectionsFaculty/Student Interactions (Maxine)
ABS/Bioengineering (Paul, Bahar)General BE Board Activity Updates (Diana, Barry)
|