20.109(F12): Mod 2 Day 5 Assessing re-tuned system

From OpenWetWare
Revision as of 06:12, 13 August 2012 by Nkuldell (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search


20.109(F12): Laboratory Fundamentals of Biological Engineering

Home        People        Schedule Fall 2012        Assignments        Lab Basics        OWW Basics       
DNA Engineering        System Engineering        Biomaterials Engineering              

Assessing Re-tuned System

Introduction

Today is a day when you'll start to collect information about the mutant candidates you've chosen. Over the next 3 lab sessions, you will look at

  1. the expression level of the mutant Cph8 proteins relative to the wildtype light sensor
  2. the DNA sequence of the region around the K-P+ hotspot
  3. the β-gal activity of the mutant photography strains grown in the light and dark
  4. the resulting bacterial photograph taken with your mutant strain

The data should be informative, though preliminary.

Cph8 Library

A map of the plasmid that encodes the light-sensor protein, Cph8, is shown. To make the library that we used last time, the plasmid was modified with a degenerate oligonucleotide. The degenerate oligo was synthesized with a mixture of nucleotides at the K-P+ relevant position T541, as shown below. PCR was used to extend the degenerate oligos to incorporate them into the pCph8 backbone. Thus PCR products are a mixture of different sequences since the initial oligo template that was PCR amplified had a variety of sequences. Fifteen possible amino acids could be encoded at T541 if the oligo is responsible for the changes we see. It's important to remember that PCR itself has a low but detectable error rate, raising the possibility that mutations outside of the K-P+ hotspot could lead to the phenotype you screened through. It's also possible that the plasmid itself is not responsible for the phenotype but rather there has been some random change in the cell's genome or in the pPCB plasmid that is responsible. As a class, though, we'll hope that there are enough interesting mutations to consider and learn from.
In advance of this experiment that you're performing, we have constructed a control for you. This control is a "kinase dead" mutant, H537A. Since the histidine that would normally be phosphorylated in the phosphorelay reactions is now an alanine, the amount of phosphorylated OmpR should be drastically diminished. The bacterial photography system that bears this mutation might have a lower value than wild type in the light and no induction of b-gal in the dark. You will test this candidate along with the wild type strain and the 2 mutants you have chosen.

DNA Sequencing

Though you don't know for certain which, if either, of your mutants exhibits detectably different activity in the context of the bacterial photography system, you will send plasmid DNA from both mutants for sequencing. The invention of automated sequencing machines has made sequence determination a fast and inexpensive endeavor. The method for sequencing DNA is not new but automation of the process is recent, developed in conjunction with the massive genome sequencing efforts of the 1990s. At the heart of sequencing reactions is chemistry worked out by Fred Sanger in the 1970’s which uses dideoxynucleotides.

Normal bases versus chain-terminating bases
Sequencing gel
Sequence trace data

These chain-terminating bases can be added to a growing chain of DNA but cannot be further extended. Performing four reactions, each with a different chain-terminating base, generates fragments of different lengths ending at G, A, T, or C. The fragments, once separated by size, reflect the DNA’s sequence. In the “old days” (all of 30 years ago!) radioactive material was incorporated into the elongating DNA fragments so they could be visualized on X-ray film (image on left). More recently fluorescent dyes, one color linked to each dideoxy-base, have been used instead. The four colored fragments can be passed through capillaries to a computer that can read the output and trace the color intensities detected (image on right). Your sample will be sequenced in this way on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer.

Today you will isolate plasmid DNA from the cells to send for sequencing. You'll also measure the β-gal activity associated with your mutant candidates. Finally, you will set up new cultures of your mutants for next time, to isolate protein from the cells you grow.

Part 1: DNA analysis and sequencing

You will isolate plasmid DNA from the overnight cultures of the 2 mutant candidates. The miniprep protocol we'll follow is already familiar to you from Module 1. Each sequencing reactions requires 800 ng of plasmid DNA, and 25 pmoles of sequencing primer in a final volume of 15 μl.

  1. Resuspended your plasmid DNA pellets in 40 ul of sterile H2O. The miniprep'd plasmid should have ~1 ug of nucleic acid/ul but that will be a mixture of RNA and DNA, so we will guess at the amount of plasmid DNA.
  2. Next you should prepare two eppendorf tubes, one to sequence each of the two mutants. Each tube should have
    • 4 ul of your plasmid DNA, mutant candidate or wild type
    • 10 ul of sequencing primer NO296 (seq = TCG TCA ACC TCA TTT TGC GCC AG, this has already been diluted 1:20 from the stock).
    • 16 ul sterile water
  3. Pipet this sequencing solution up and down to mix and then transfer 15 ul to one of the tubes in the 8-tube strip we will turn in at the dropbox in the hall for Genewiz. The data will be available for you to examine < one week from today. Keep your fingers crossed.

Part 2: β-galactosidase Assay

You will measure the β-gal activity associated with the wild type, the kinase dead, and the mutant candidates grown in the light and the dark. You should also set up 5 ml overnight cultures for your samples in the dark to measure protein concentrations next time. Review the protocols here and here for details and ask the teaching faculty if you need help. The overnights can be set up in sterile glass tubes using 5 ul of your dark grown overnights to innoculate the fresh media. Calculate the b-gal activity of your samples before you leave today.

Part 3: Writing Faculty

We'll end the day with a discussion about the format of scientific articles, and good writing.

DONE!

OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT

These assignments

  • should be done before the next lab period
  • are ungraded
  • can be uploaded to the Stellar drop-box that's here.

You are STRONGLY encouraged to do these assignments since they all serve as important starting materials for your major graded assignments. An answer key for many of the assignments will be posted after you have uploaded your assignment.

M2D5 assignment: If you have chosen the written communication concentration for this module, you could prepare an outline for the introduction to the research article that you will write to describe your work in this experimental module. Your outline should include references that you have found to describe the system and your tuning of it. At this point the references can be in any format you choose but recall that the reference list you turn in must be annotated. For half your references, you will follow the citation with a 10-15 word description of the key aspect of the paper you're citing. A nice example of such an annotated reference list is shown here.

Reagents

  • for β-gal assay
    • Z-buffer
      • 0.06 M Na2HPO4
      • 0.04 M NaH2PO4*H2O
      • 0.001 M KCl
      • 0.0001 M MgSO4
    • 4 mg/ml ONPG
    • 1M Na2CO3
  • for alkaline lysis miniprep
    • Solution I
    • 25 mM Tris pH8
    • 10 mM EDTA pH8
    • 5 mM Glucose
    • Solution II
    • 1% SDS
    • 0.2M NaOH
    • Solution III
    • 3M KAc, pH 4.8
  • Sequencing primer NO296
      • 5'- TCG TCA ACC TCA TTT TGC GCC AG -3'
      • starts at ~3500 in pCph8