# User:Brian P. Josey/Notebook/2010/07/15

Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

## Theoretical and Experimental Forces

After some trouble, I created a new working model in FEMM that better represents the way I have the magnet mounted on the microscope's stage. Up to this point most of my models have been best case scenario models, that focus on areas that would be unobservable in a microscope, like within a few fractions of millimeter of the cone-tip on the yoke. This new model instead focuses on what I can observe. Experimentally, the magnet is held flush to the flow cell at a 45o angle as close to the field of view without obstructing it. I would estimate this distance as being about 2.0 mm, and ran my experiment as such. After analyzing the data I gathered on the sixth, I was able to calculate the forces exerted on the ferritin. Here is the table including the forces:

It would be more correct to say that the measured forces, Average Force on Ferritin in the table, is actually the average force ferritin exerts on the droplet, but I am assuming that they are the same. There is also the issue with the direction of the force. In the above calculation, I measured the force as the average over the whole displacement, while it would be more useful to measure the displacement along the y-axis, towards the magnet. It is also difficult to estimate the diameter of the droplets, and in turn the number of ferritin in each droplet, which could result in a miscalculation. I hope to resolve both of these issues in the coming days as I work on the LabVIEW program for this.

The model I created was a little simplified compared to the actual experiment. Since glass is non-magnetic, I substituted air for the glass as the material surrounding the flow cell. Not knowing details of the objective, I measured its outer dimensions, and ran several iterations of the problem. Each of these iterations was to test the addition of magnets and changing the properties of the objective. The iterations were:

• Iteration 1- Only the cone was magnetized, and the objective was made from air.
• Iteration 2- Only the cone was magnetized, and the objective was made of aluminum.
• Iteration 3- Both the cone and longer magnet were magnetized, and the objective was made from air.
• Iteration 4- Both the cone and longer magnet were magnetized, and the objective was made from aluminum. This iteration is the one that most closely represents the real experiment out of the six.
• Iteration 5- Both the cone and longer magnet were magnetized, and the objective was made from a slightly magnetizable steel.
• Iteration 6- Both the cone and longer magnet were magnetized, and the objective was made from pure iron.

The reason I created different iterations, with different number of magnets and materials was to demonstrate that neither variable has a real effect on the magnitude of the force. As can be seen in the table bellow, the average force in the field of view is unaffected by the addition of more magnets or even in the presence of an all iron objective.