User talk:Vincent Rouilly: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(whoseonline)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(discussion with [[User:Julius_B._Lucks]] at BioSysBio08 in London)
* journal club (blog)
** monthly discussion - one paper per month
** possible vote for current paper (in the future)
* OWW overlay journal
*# within OWW wiki pages
*# snapshots sent to arXiv for references and more polished works (also a reach out effort to other arXiv comunties)
** sections
*** protocols
*** lab notebook pages
*** ...
** one wiki page for current edition, one archive page with links to history of the main page
* creating syn-bio arXiv
** protocols - snapshot + current comments in the form of a discussion section (keep user names and timestamps)?
** BBF standard RFCs
** journal club polished reviews
* OWW version of Faculty of 1000
*** could use Digg-like voting system to vote on papers
*** could have user ratings of papers
* Feedback Wanted Blog
[[User:Peixuan Pey|Peixuan Pey]] Yes they are all in the iGEM Imperial 2007 domain. I change them in my sandbox but update them when they are ready. They have all been updated in the wetlab>protocols page.
[[User:Peixuan Pey|Peixuan Pey]] Yes they are all in the iGEM Imperial 2007 domain. I change them in my sandbox but update them when they are ready. They have all been updated in the wetlab>protocols page.


Line 28: Line 53:
== whoseonline ==
== whoseonline ==


yeah, i think we can put it somewhere more prominent.  looks like the formatting is getting better.  there seems to be a bullet list going on now.  Mayeb the front page could say something like there are currenly X people editing OWW, click here to see who.  that way it doesn't take up too much space.
'''[[User:Jason R. Kelly|Jason R. Kelly]] 13:32, 11 February 2008 (CST)''':yeah, i think we can put it somewhere more prominent.  looks like the formatting is getting better.  there seems to be a bullet list going on now.  Mayeb the front page could say something like there are currenly X people editing OWW, click here to see who.  that way it doesn't take up too much space.

Latest revision as of 02:02, 22 April 2008

(discussion with User:Julius_B._Lucks at BioSysBio08 in London)

  • journal club (blog)
    • monthly discussion - one paper per month
    • possible vote for current paper (in the future)
  • OWW overlay journal
    1. within OWW wiki pages
    2. snapshots sent to arXiv for references and more polished works (also a reach out effort to other arXiv comunties)
    • sections
      • protocols
      • lab notebook pages
      • ...
    • one wiki page for current edition, one archive page with links to history of the main page
  • creating syn-bio arXiv
    • protocols - snapshot + current comments in the form of a discussion section (keep user names and timestamps)?
    • BBF standard RFCs
    • journal club polished reviews
  • OWW version of Faculty of 1000
      • could use Digg-like voting system to vote on papers
      • could have user ratings of papers
  • Feedback Wanted Blog



Peixuan Pey Yes they are all in the iGEM Imperial 2007 domain. I change them in my sandbox but update them when they are ready. They have all been updated in the wetlab>protocols page.

Peixuan Pey Oops! Ok I will put them in our domain now... :p

Lucks 09:08, 2 April 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent, great idea about being more specific. I think doing so will help us a great deal. I am on Skype now, and will be for the rest of the day except for a short burst, so let's chat!

Lucks 19:37, 1 April 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent, I have put up a draft of our report here. Check it out and edit away! We can Skype anytime you want.

Lucks 10:00, 1 April 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent. Perhaps the best way to reach each other is via chat or something. I have a google chat account with the name julius.lucks, or an AIM account with name jblucks. I'll be on Skype for the next hour or so, but then I have to take a road trip for about 6 hours and won't be available to Skype until about midnight your time.

If we aren't able to get in touch with each other, I will go ahead and write the summary tonight and you can see what you think tomorrow.

Lucks 10:16, 31 March 2007 (EDT):Hey Vincent - I messed up - I forgot that UK was 5 hours and not 6 hours off! Unfortunately I have another meeting then. Are you around later this evening on Skype? If not, then perhaps we can do tomorrow - in the early afternoon for you? Sorry about this. Email me: lucks at fas dot harvard dot edu. - Julius

Lucks 07:27, 30 March 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent - I added you to my skype list. My skype name is 'lucksj'. How about 4PM your time for a convo?

Lucks 08:31, 28 March 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent - I was afraid time would slip by and the next SC meeting would creep up before I knew it! So we need to get a little organized before the meeting. I'll try to fill out some of the details on the page, but do you want to skype or chat sometime before the meeting. Maybe Saturday or Sunday? I guess we need to prepare a brief report by Monday for the meeting. My skype id is lucksj.


Lucks 08:47, 12 March 2007 (EDT): Hey Vincent - I agree with your ideas. I'll start gathering some of the information for the documentation. It should get us organized for a broader outreach.

Lucks 13:23, 9 March 2007 (EST):Hey Vincent. I started brainstorming some ideas for outreach at Outreach chairs. Let's discuss some of these options and figure out where to go from here.


Austin 13:26, 17 July 2006 (EDT): About your question "About the Registry, would it be possible to use, in the future, registry wiki tags within openwetware ? the ones which have been created to merge the registry within the iGEM wiki, such as <partinfo>BBa_FXXXX SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> or <partinfo>BBa_FXXXX short</partinfo>": the iGEM wiki as of now does not support these tags (I just asked Randy), but he could easily enable it as the igem and registry wiki are on the same machine. For openwetware and other wikis to support this requires a small wrapper to be written (some coding which you'll have to bug Randy to write first). Otherwise, there's no way for an external program to access this info easily. Bold text

whoseonline

Jason R. Kelly 13:32, 11 February 2008 (CST):yeah, i think we can put it somewhere more prominent. looks like the formatting is getting better. there seems to be a bullet list going on now. Mayeb the front page could say something like there are currenly X people editing OWW, click here to see who. that way it doesn't take up too much space.