User talk:Rebeka Winkler/Notebook/Biology 210 at AU: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


'''1/30/2015'''
'''1/30/2015'''
Your drawings of the protists are nice! The introduction is missing a hypothesis/prediction. You kind of have this in your data section when you talk about organisms being closer to vegetation, so you might just want to move those two sentences. The conclusion should also talk about whether you did find a difference between the two niches. For your serial dilution, it is 10 mL of nutrient broth, not 100. Also, I can't see the image for the dilution. LS
Your drawings of the protists are nice! The introduction is missing a hypothesis/prediction. You kind of have this in your data section when you talk about organisms being closer to vegetation, so you might just want to move those two sentences. The conclusion should also talk about whether you did find a difference between the two niches. You should have tried to measure the lengths of the protists using the ocular ruler. For your serial dilution, it is 10 mL of nutrient broth, not 100. Also, I can't see the image for the dilution. LS

Revision as of 15:16, 30 January 2015

1/26/2015 You did a very thorough job describing your transect. Please add a little about how you made the Hay Infusion. The links to your figures do not appear to work - maybe you didn't save the uploaded images? Remember that "abiotic" does not necessarily mean man-made; it includes water and soil. LS

1/30/2015 Your drawings of the protists are nice! The introduction is missing a hypothesis/prediction. You kind of have this in your data section when you talk about organisms being closer to vegetation, so you might just want to move those two sentences. The conclusion should also talk about whether you did find a difference between the two niches. You should have tried to measure the lengths of the protists using the ocular ruler. For your serial dilution, it is 10 mL of nutrient broth, not 100. Also, I can't see the image for the dilution. LS