User talk:Hannah Kempton

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
(Nanodelivery)
Line 17: Line 17:
**NPs able to cross BBB and mediate repair of BBB damage that may be responsible for diseases like Alzheimer’s
**NPs able to cross BBB and mediate repair of BBB damage that may be responsible for diseases like Alzheimer’s
**For our purposes, NPs may serve as an effective vector, containing siRNA or other drugs, for targeted drug delivery across the BBB
**For our purposes, NPs may serve as an effective vector, containing siRNA or other drugs, for targeted drug delivery across the BBB
-
 
==Significance==
==Significance==

Revision as of 20:07, 2 December 2013

Contents

Overview: siRNA Delivery Across the Blood Brain Barrier to treat Huntington's Disease

  • Overview Sentence

Background

Blood Brain Barrier

  • The blood brain barrier (BBB) plays a crucial role in modulating cerebral homeostasis and directing neuronal functions. It separates circulating blood from cerebrospinal brain fluid and prevents harmful toxins from reaching the brain.
  • In other parts of the body, the thin endothelial cells lining vessel and capillary walls overlap at leaky junctions that are flexible enough to allow larger molecules like hormones, viruses, and bacteria to squeeze through the junctions or diffuse directly through the cells into the surrounding tissue.
  • However, the endothelial cells lining blood vessels in the brain overlap at tight junctions and are surrounded by a thick basal membrane containing contractile pericytes as well as astrocytic glial cells that provide nutrients and play a role in brain and spinal cord repair. These cells are collectively known as the BBB.
  • The BBB only allows small, essential hydrophobic molecules like O2 and glucose and essential ions like Na+, K+, and Cl- to pass from the blood to the brain and central nervous system (CNS), but prevents the passage of molecules greater than about 500 Da.

Nanodelivery

  • Recently, the use of nanoparticles (NPs) has become increasingly common in solving environmental and medical problems, particularly in targeted drug delivery systems, among others
  • Due to their size, NPs are unique in that their chemical, physical, and biological properties differ from that of their bulk materials, so they can be considered “new” material
  • Significance of Nanoscience in Medicine
    • Higher surface area:volume ratio → nanomaterials have higher reactivity, mechanical strength, and magnetic or electrical properties
    • NPs able to cross BBB and mediate repair of BBB damage that may be responsible for diseases like Alzheimer’s
    • For our purposes, NPs may serve as an effective vector, containing siRNA or other drugs, for targeted drug delivery across the BBB

Significance

Central Idea: Bridging the Gap

  • talk about our idea and its scientific context: combining developing field of nanotechnology to deliver siRNAs
  • Typically, viruses are used: talk about why bad
  • Will have many applications once the nanodelivery is optimized: for this study we will focus on delivering siRNAs for the purpose of therapeutics in Huntington's Disease, but the optimized siRNA delivery technique will be widely applicable


Huntington's Disease

  • stuff about disease: why we selected Huntington's (social context: any improvement on current treatment is good)

Experimental Overview

siRNA

  • explain we're not designing them just taking them from another paper that successfully used viral delivery

in vitro BBB mode

  • explain justification for doing in vitro
  • briefly describe selected model

Main Experimental Goal: Optimization of nanodelivery method to successfully deliver siRNA across BBB

References

  • Nanobiotechnology-Based Strategies for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier
    • http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/770396
    • Intro
      • Issues with some existing methods: damage bbb
      • “ The ideal method for transporting drugs across the BBB should be controlled and should not damage the barrier. Among the various approaches that are available, nanobiotechnology-based delivery methods provide the best prospects for achieving this ideal. This review describes various nanoparticle (NP)-based methods used for drug delivery to the brain and the known underlying mechanisms.”
      • “Some strategies require multifunctional NPs combining controlled passage across the BBB with targeted delivery of the therapeutic cargo to the intended site of action in the brain.”
      • Fig 1 could be useful to base a figure off of in background info
      • macromolecules can pass via receptor-mediated process (ex transferrin (Tf), insulin, immunoglobulin G)
      • also remember some disorders increase BBB permeability as part of pathogenesis
      • The upper limit of pore size in the BBB that enables passive flow of molecules across it is usually <1 nm; however, particles that have a diameter of several nanometers can also cross the BBB by carrier-mediated transport
    • Ideal Method of Transport
      • It should be controlled;
      • It should not damage the barrier;
      • The carrier system should be biodegradable and not toxic;
      • Transport of drugs across the BBB should be selective;
      • Systemic delivery should be targeted to the BBB and the site of intended action in the brain;
      • The drug load transported through the BBB should be adequate for reaching therapeutic concentrations in the brain;
      • Therapeutic concentrations should be maintained for a sufficient duration of time for the desired efficacy.
    • NPs used
      • Various factors that influence the transport include: type of polymer or surfactant used, NP size and the drug molecule.
      • lipid NPs
      • liposomes
      • polymeric NPs (put Tf receptors on outside so can cross via Tf receptors) “molecular trojan horse”
        • chitosan, dendrimers, nanogels, plga
      • delivering siRNAs?
      • lots on brain tumor treatment
  • In vitro blood-brain barrier models: current and perspective technologies
    • http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22213383
    • “ In this article, we provide a detailed review and analysis of currently available in vitro BBB models ranging from static culture systems to the most advanced ow-based and three-dimensional coculture apparatus.”
    • has good explanation for why in vitro models important: maybe reference in justifying why our study will be all in vitro
    • discusses ideal characteristics of BBB model
      • expression of tight junctions
      • appropriate distribution of transporters
      • efflux mechanisms (?)
      • differentiating permeability
    • for endothelial cells (ECs) to grow properly, need shear stress (flow) and cell-cell interactions (glia, astrocytes)
    • describes many available models: we will select one of these that seems optimal (widely used, not too expensive)
  • Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease
    • http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222669
    • Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors
    • Huntingtin (htt) gene discovered in 1993
      • 3000 aa, 350 kDa
      • In normal individuals, 8 - 27 CAG (polyglutamine) repeats, increases to > 35 repeats in HD patients; cortical degradation also featured in pathology
      • Motor phenomena → Chorea (random, spontaneous and involuntary dance-like movements), psychiatric symptoms (OCD, anxiety, paranoia, depression)
      • Non-motor (cognitive) symptoms--executive functions, procedural memory, etc--often present years before other signs → more debilitating than motor symptoms
    • “An ideal therapy for HD should not only target the triad of symptoms (motor, cognitive, psychiatric) experienced by patients but also halt the progression of these symptoms by preventing or stalling neuronal death. An additional challenge to any therapy is developing the best method of administration” → gene therapy
    • 2 main targets for preventing neuronal death in HD
      • Growth factors provide cell w/needed nutritional/survival support → however, these typically work in animal models of CNS disorders but fail in clinical trials
      • reducing mutant Huntingtin protein → Use RNAi
    • Various classes of viral vectors
      • adenovirus → problematic due to immunological issues
      • lentivirus (LV) → retrovirus insert genetic material into host genome, used successfully in nonhuman primate models
      • adeno-associated viral (AAV) → non-pathogenic, low immunogenicity, also used in animal models/clinical trials for neurodeg. disease, better at transducing certain brain areas compared to LV vectors
        • Ideal because allow quick transduction (2- 4 weeks) of cells, sustained expression of gene of interest (GOI) for decades
      • Problems with AAV (and viruses in general)
        • different response in neonatal versus adult mice, possibly due to higher levels of astrocytes in adults (which trap AAV9)
        • 80% of population has antibodies to capsid proteins of WT AAV2/2, and 30 - 70% of these have antibodies that would neutralize capsid protein of AAV → prevents gene transfer in these patients, which would be a problem especially in repeated AAV exposure/administration
  • Using non-coding small RNAs to develop therapies for Huntington's disease
    • http://www.nature.com/gt/journal/v18/n12/full/gt2011170a.html
    • As it is caused by a single, highly penetrant mutation at a defined locus, HD is potentially amenable to gene therapy using non-coding RNA.
    • a double-stranded RNA of 19–23 ribonucleotides directs gene silencing.
    • It is known that most HD patients are heterozygous at the HD locus, carrying one mutant and one wild-type allele. Although mutant huntingtin protein is toxic to neurons, its wild-type counterpart is protective against apoptotic neuronal death. An effective gene therapy must silence the deleterious mutant allele without eliminating expression of the beneficial wild-type one.
    • Because of the lack of a transgenic animal model expressing both alleles of human wild-type and mutant HD gene, allele-specific silencing is conducted in cells from HD patients currently.
      • i think we will definitely want to do ours in vitro, there seems to be a lot of iffy-ness about mouse models and i’m not sure that’s something we want to get into
    • There are two sites in the mutant allele to which RNAi can target: mutant HD allele genetically linked SNP sites or expanded CAG repeats.
    • goes into a lot of detail!!!


  • Self-assembling Modified β‑Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles as Neuronal siRNA Delivery Vectors: Focus on Huntington’s Disease
    • http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/mp3003946
    • This paper is kind of similar to what we plan to do, but they only used their nanoparticles to get into neurons and did not account for BBB: They used a nanodelivery method that could deliver the siRNA across neuronal membranes, but then injected that directly into the brain, bypassing BBB completely
    • We can build off from that and say, well, this is a cool idea, but maybe it only works if you inject the NPs directly to the brain → ours should improve BBB passage so if effective it would be more therapeutically appealing (no injecting into patients brain)
Personal tools