User:Timothee Flutre/Notebook/Postdoc/2012/10/09
From OpenWetWare
< User:Timothee Flutre | Notebook | Postdoc | 2012 | 10(Difference between revisions)
(Autocreate 2012/10/09 Entry for User:Timothee_Flutre/Notebook/Postdoc) |
Current revision (16:32, 13 November 2012) (view source) (→Expert writing (academic and professional): add intro) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
| - | == | + | ==Expert writing (academic and professional)== |
| - | + | ||
| + | ''(Notes from The Little Red Schoolhouse at the University of Chicago.)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Interferences between what the writer wants and what the reader wants. | ||
| + | ** Readers tend to see the world in terms of actions, and thus they look for verbs. But writers store/remember the important concepts of their field as nouns, not verbs. | ||
| + | ** Readers tend to understand the world in terms of characters (someone/something capable of acting), and they expect to find them in subjects. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Diagnostics when reading a text: | ||
| + | ** underline verbs and ask if they correspond to significant actions; | ||
| + | ** underline subjects and ask if they correspond to significant characters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Principles of clear writing: | ||
| + | ** express as verbs (rather than nominalizations) the actions one want the readers to focus on; | ||
| + | ** express as subjects the characters one wants the readers to focus on, and be consistent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Tips: | ||
| + | ** Subjects create focus, so choose them according to the readers, but also choose those that are valued by the readers. | ||
| + | ** Possible to use passive verbs when they allow a character to be the subject. | ||
| + | ** Possible to use nominalizations when they are also perceived by the readers as characters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Structuring long sentences: | ||
| + | ** easier to read when the subject+verb ("core") are together and at (close to) the beginning | ||
| + | ** write long sentences with ("connectors/orientors" + "core" + "other") repeated N times | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Information flow: | ||
| + | ** readers need some old, simple information in ''every'' sentence | ||
| + | ** the old information should come ''before'' the new, complex information which is at the end (stress position) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Introduction: | ||
| + | ** must provide information (for readers who don't know) and motivation (for readers who don't care) | ||
| + | ** statis -> concession -> destabilizing condition (''but'') -> consequences: all this helps persuade the reader that we're going to address an important problem | ||
| + | ** filling a gap is good, but changing a previous belief is usually better | ||
| + | ** manifest problem (we have a problem to solve) versus critical problem (actually, we have a different problem) -> gives the impression that the writer is doing critical thinking (not only informing, but criticizing) | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
Current revision
Main project page Previous entry Next entry
| |
Expert writing (academic and professional)(Notes from The Little Red Schoolhouse at the University of Chicago.)
| |



