User:TheLarry/Notebook/Larrys Notebook/2010/08/24: Difference between revisions
(→Paper) |
(→Paper) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*Results | *Results | ||
**our stuff matches experimental data | **our stuff matches experimental data | ||
***velocity | |||
***processivity histogram | |||
***run time histogram | |||
***ATP consumption (ratio of 1 atp consumed/step taken) | |||
***Michaelis-Menten curve | |||
**core cycle | **core cycle | ||
**most probable way to detach | **most probable way to detach |
Revision as of 15:35, 24 August 2010
Monte Carlo Simulation | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Michaelis MentenI got the michaelis menten dependency i wanted from yesterday. I decreased the neck linker from 40 (total) amino acids to 30. Meaning the complete length is 10.5 nm, and in the normal state (D/U) it is 7 nm needing to transverse 4.5 nm or -11.5. This lowered the rate of transition from an U/U state to 5 1/s which is what allowed the michaelis menten constant to be low. This increased the off rate for ADP bound head dramatically, but it hasn't caused a problem yet. So i am happy with this. The only thing left to do is deal with inorganic phosphate release value Paperwith everything looking good again, i think i can go back to the paper. i think this paper is going to get a good overhaul now with the changes we made so it'll look like this
I was thinking of taking out the markov stuff, and maybe making it a supplemental info. like it is also possible to analyze this model this way, because it doesn't really say anything new that we can't get out of the monte carlo method |