User:Saroj Pandey/Notebook/SNP PCR optimization/2014/10/02: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(fix raw html notebook nav)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|-
|-
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:owwnotebook_icon.png|128px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> Project name</span>
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:owwnotebook_icon.png|128px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> Project name</span>
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|[[File:Report.png|frameless|link={{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}]][[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[File:Resultset_previous.png|frameless|link={{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]][[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]][[File:Resultset_next.png|frameless|link={{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]]}}
|-
|-
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
Line 9: Line 9:


• Genomic DNAs were used as templates to amplify different regions of DNA including the taste SNP
• Genomic DNAs were used as templates to amplify different regions of DNA including the taste SNP
[[Image:combiPCR_02.10.jpg|right|thumb|400px|PCR program]]
[[Image:combiPCRelec_02.10.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Electrophoresis]]
'''Primer combinations'''


1. Product size: 510bp [gaF + Gfb(R)]
1. Product size: 510bp [gaF + Gfb(R)]
Line 59: Line 64:




[[Image:combiPCR_02.10.jpg]]
 
 
 
'''Observation'''
 
[gaF+Gfb(R) and  gaF+Cfb(R)] : Allele specific reverse primers showed bands with the corresponding templates just above 500bp.
 
[Gff(F)+gaR and Cff(F)+gaR] : Allele specific forward primer produced an expected specific band only with non-taster template  but not with the taster one. Rather a thick bright band was seen at 100bp with taster template.
 
• [Cfb(F)+Gfb(R) and  Cfb(F)+Cfb(R)] : Allele specific reverse primers also worked with a different forward primer producing shorter bands (235bp)
 
• [Gff(F)+Cff(R) and Cff(F)+Cff(R)] : Allele specific forward primers produced similar bands with both templates and were unable to distinguish between the two.
 
 
'''Conclusion'''
 
• Allele specific reverse primers when combined with a non-specific common forward primer are able to differentiate the SNPs.
 
• There might have been pipetting error for different results seen with allele specific forward primers or they might not be the right primers to differentiate the taste SNPs.





Latest revision as of 00:22, 27 September 2017

Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

PCR with different primer combinations

• Genomic DNAs were used as templates to amplify different regions of DNA including the taste SNP

PCR program
Electrophoresis

Primer combinations

1. Product size: 510bp [gaF + Gfb(R)]

gaF: ATCCGTGATGCTGTGCTATG

Gfb(R): CAATCACTGTTGCTCAGTGC

2. Product size: 510bp [gaF + Cfb(R)]

gaF: ATCCGTGATGCTGTGCTATG

Gfb(R): CAATCACTGTTGCTCAGTGG

3. Product size: 522bp [Gff(F) + gaR]

Gff(F): GGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCAGG

gaR: GCATCCCAGAAGAAACCAGA

4. Product size: 522bp [Cff(F) + gaR]

Gff(F): GGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCAGC

gaR: GCATCCCAGAAGAAACCAGA

5. Product size: 235bp [Cfb(F) + Gfb(R)]

Cfb(F): GGTGGCAACCAGGTCTTTAG

Gfb(R): CAATCACTGTTGCTCAGTGC

6. Product size: 235bp [Cfb(F) + Cfb(R)]

Cfb(F): GGTGGCAACCAGGTCTTTAG

Cfb(R): CAATCACTGTTGCTCAGTGG

7. Product size: 161bp [Gff(F) + Cff(R)]

Gff(F): GGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCAGG

Cff(R): GATGGCTTGGTAGCTGTGGT

8. Product size: 161bp [Cff(F) + Cff(R)]

Cff(F): GGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCAGC

Cff(R): GATGGCTTGGTAGCTGTGGT



Observation

• [gaF+Gfb(R) and gaF+Cfb(R)] : Allele specific reverse primers showed bands with the corresponding templates just above 500bp.

• [Gff(F)+gaR and Cff(F)+gaR] : Allele specific forward primer produced an expected specific band only with non-taster template but not with the taster one. Rather a thick bright band was seen at 100bp with taster template.

• [Cfb(F)+Gfb(R) and Cfb(F)+Cfb(R)] : Allele specific reverse primers also worked with a different forward primer producing shorter bands (235bp)

• [Gff(F)+Cff(R) and Cff(F)+Cff(R)] : Allele specific forward primers produced similar bands with both templates and were unable to distinguish between the two.


Conclusion

• Allele specific reverse primers when combined with a non-specific common forward primer are able to differentiate the SNPs.

• There might have been pipetting error for different results seen with allele specific forward primers or they might not be the right primers to differentiate the taste SNPs.