User:Reshma P. Shetty/Scratchpad

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search

Random notes to keep track of

Chromosomal integration

  1. Haldimann A and Wanner BL. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2001 Nov;183(21):6384-93. DOI:10.1128/JB.183.21.6384-6393.2001 | PubMed ID:11591683 | HubMed [Haldimann-JBacteriol-2001]
  2. Platt R, Drescher C, Park SK, and Phillips GJ. Genetic system for reversible integration of DNA constructs and lacZ gene fusions into the Escherichia coli chromosome. Plasmid. 2000 Jan;43(1):12-23. DOI:10.1006/plas.1999.1433 | PubMed ID:10610816 | HubMed [Platt-Plasmid-2000]
  3. Katz L, Brown DP, and Donadio S. Site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli between the att sites of plasmid pSE211 from Saccharopolyspora erythraea. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 May;227(1):155-9. DOI:10.1007/BF00260721 | PubMed ID:2046656 | HubMed [Katz-MolGenGenet-1991]
  4. Hasan N, Koob M, and Szybalski W. Escherichia coli genome targeting, I. Cre-lox-mediated in vitro generation of ori- plasmids and their in vivo chromosomal integration and retrieval. Gene. 1994 Dec 2;150(1):51-6. DOI:10.1016/0378-1119(94)90856-7 | PubMed ID:7959062 | HubMed [Hasan-Gene-1994]
  5. Diederich L, Rasmussen LJ, and Messer W. New cloning vectors for integration in the lambda attachment site attB of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Plasmid. 1992 Jul;28(1):14-24. DOI:10.1016/0147-619x(92)90032-6 | PubMed ID:1387714 | HubMed [Diederich-Plasmid-1992]
  6. Le Borgne S, Bolívar F, and Gosset G. Plasmid vectors for marker-free chromosomal insertion of genetic material in Escherichia coli. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;267:135-43. DOI:10.1385/1-59259-774-2:135 | PubMed ID:15269421 | HubMed [LeBorgne-MethodsMolBiol-1994]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Protein purification

Notes from the following book ...

  1. ISBN:0387940723 [Scopes]

Chromatography

  • even packing and constant, even flow through the column is key to good results

Concentration

Precipitation

  • ammonium sulfate or sometimes acetone is used to precipitate protein and resuspend in a smaller volume
  • must remove precipitant
  • precipitation usually only works for protein solutions with concentration > 1mg/mL.
    • lower concentrations eithr don't precipitate or denature

Adsorption to an ion exchanger

  • good for dilute solutions

Dialysis

  • semi-permeable membrane removes water
  • ultrafiltration
    • very fast and effective on dilute solutions
  • centrifugal filtration
    • low volumes

Gel filtration

  • at least 10-15% loss of protein can be expected
  • can use centrifugation for small volumes[8]

Osmotic removal

  • sample is placed in dialysis tubing and immersed in solution or powder like PEG
  • be careful not to contaminate protein solution with polymer solution

Buffer exchange

Dialysis

  • often need multiple dialysis steps
  • proteolytic degradation may occur
  • slow

Gel filtration

  • preequilibrate column with buffer that the protein is to be exchanged into
  • rapid "desalting" occurs in one pass if the sample volume if < 1/5 column volume
  • small columns should be packed with finer grade beads to retain optimal resolution
  • rapid desalting of small samples with no dilution can be achieved by centrifugal method. Column of Sephadex G-25 is used inside a benchtop centrifuge.
  • sample should not have too much salt or protein for optimum separation
  • protein concentration should be < 30 mg/mL
  • doesn't matter what the column is washed with since protein travels before solvent front
  • final volume may be larger than initial volume before desalting
  • for buffer exchange, if protein concentration is low and volume large, "salt out" first and dissolve in a small volume of buffer and then use a relatively small desalting column

References

  1. Saul A and Don M. A rapid method of concentrating proteins in small volumes with high recovery using Sephadex G-25. Anal Biochem. 1984 May 1;138(2):451-3. DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90838-8 | PubMed ID:6204553 | HubMed [Saul-AnalBiochem-1984]
  2. Helmerhorst E and Stokes GB. Microcentrifuge desalting: a rapid, quantitative method for desalting small amounts of protein. Anal Biochem. 1980 May 1;104(1):130-5. DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(80)90287-0 | PubMed ID:6247935 | HubMed [Helmerhorst-AnalBiochem-1980]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Notes from chat with Kathleen

Thanks Kathleen! Note that any errors below are mine.

Check solubility of protein

  • His tags can promote aggregation of protein and formation of inclusion bodies.
  • Proteins can be insoluble/aggregate, even without the His tag. Sometimes it's a function of overexpression as well. It's a good idea to check the solubility of each new protein you make. If things are insoluble, you may be able to get enough protein by just purifying the soluble portion, purifying inclusion bodies and "refolding", or altering the expression conditions to increase solubility. Alternatively, you may consider making a new construct (moving the positon of the His-tag, expressing/purifying your protein as a fusion protein, etc.).--Kathleen

Procedure

  1. Grow a 3mL culture.
  2. Take 1mL of culture and
    1. Pellet cells
    2. Resuspend in buffer with 8M urea. (50–100 µL--Kathleen)
    3. Add SDS loading buffer.
    4. Lyse by heating at 95°C for 10 mins.
    5. Spin 10 mins at high speed in microcentrifuge.
    6. Save 5-10 μL to run on a gel. (This is the total protein.)
  3. Take another 1mL aliquot of culture and
    1. Pellet cells
    2. Resuspend in 50–100 µL of a "native" buffer.
    3. Add lysozyme (Lysozyme is ~14 kDa, so make sure it won't run in the same spot on a gel as your protein! If it is going to be a problem, freeze-thaw only should work reasonably well for this test. It is hard to sonicate small volumes. You could also try a commercial "mild lysis" reagent, although people in our lab have had varied success with these.--Kathleen)
    4. Freeze thaw 2-3 times at -80°C
    5. Spin 10 mins at high speed in microcentrifuge.
    6. Save some supernatant to run on a gel. (This is the soluble fraction).
    7. Resuspend pellet in buffer with 8M urea. (50–100 µL)
    8. Save some resuspended pellet to load on a gel. (This is the insoluble fraction).

Note: the amount of material you load from the supernatant and pellet should add up to the total protein so that you are comparing equivalent amounts.

General issues with protein purifications

  • Even when doing denaturing purifications, add 10mM imidazole to solutions to help with washing out non His tagged proteins.
  • May want to add small amounts of EDTA to the eluant to chelate heavy metals like Ni. Heavy metals can catalyze oxidation reactions that destroy your protein. However, the zinc content needs to account for the presence of EDTA.
  • Start with 1L of protein and do a larger scale prep. Thus, if the protein is crashing out of solution upon buffer exchange, you can see it very easily. With small volumes, it can be hard to see. If that happens, just start playing with the pH and salt content.
  • For buffer exchange, the Sauer lab generally does either dialysis or gravity flow gel filtration (much faster). However they are usually working with much larger volumes ... 1L culture eluted in 2.5-3 mL. They then run this through a PD10 column from Amersham. Or else 0.5-1mL through a NAPS column. There are also columns for 20-100μL.

Native purifications

  • Sauer lab uses a slightly higher salt concentration than what the Qiagen manual calls for because supposedly the wash is improved somewhat. This was done with a DNA binding protein.
  • Can lyse cells by doing repeated freeze-thaw cycles at -80°C or sonication also works.
  • Can consider using a SlyD knockout strain. SlyD is a 20-25 kDa protein that has several histidines near each other and can often contaminate Ni column purifications.

Refolding a protein on the column

  1. Lyse cells in denaturing buffer supplemented with 10 mM imidazole
  2. Run through column
  3. Wash with "native" wash buffer (contains 20mM imidazole)
    • The protein should refold on the column.
  4. Elute in "native" elution solution.

Centrifugal filtrations

  • Even though they are not supposed to, sometimes these columns can end up concentrating your buffers. This may explain why my dye front runs oddly when loading samples from the microcon. The salt content has been increased.
  • These columns tend to bind an absolute amount of protein, not a fraction of what you send through it. Hence, larger scale preps tend to be preferable.

Desalting resin columns

Circular dichroism

Some samples to compare

  1. Protein purified via denaturing prep with gel filtration buffer exchange into protein DNA binding buffer without BSA
  2. Negative control purified via denaturing prep with gel filtration buffer exchange into protein DNA binding buffer without BSA
  3. Protein purified via refolding prep with gel filtration buffer exchange into protein DNA binding buffer without BSA
  4. Negative control purified via refolding prep with gel filtration buffer exchange into protein DNA binding buffer without BSA
  5. protein DNA binding buffer without BSA
  6. Samples +/- DNA
  7. Samples +/- Zinc (or +/- EDTA)

Other affinity tags

IMPACT

Zinc proteins