User:Pranav Rathi/Notebook/OT/2010/03/03

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Autocreate 2010/03/03 Entry for User:Pranav_Rathi/Notebook/OT)
(Entry title)
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
-
==Entry title==
+
Today 03/05/10 I did a quick experiment to measure that how much intensity we might have to cut down to snap the beam profile without saturating ccd. It turned out to be roughly 1e-7W, if input is 1W. Later I explored the possibility of using multiple reflections to cut down the intensity. It turned out that 1 plane glass strip cut down the intensity 10%. So 7 consecutively reflection will cut down the intensity up to roughly 1e-7. BUT each reflections contain 2 reflections out of two surfaces (I used 1mm thick), so total 14 REFLECTIONS. If use just an ultra thin may be a glass membrane carefully with one or two NDs than this can be done and beam profile might still be preserved. Still working……
-
* OptoBio
+
 +
I emailed Mr. Gunn on 03/04/10, about profiling the beam at higher powers, and waiting for his reply.
-
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
+
[[Category: General Notes]]
-
|}
+
-
 
+
-
__NOTOC__
+

Revision as of 15:23, 11 March 2010

Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Today 03/05/10 I did a quick experiment to measure that how much intensity we might have to cut down to snap the beam profile without saturating ccd. It turned out to be roughly 1e-7W, if input is 1W. Later I explored the possibility of using multiple reflections to cut down the intensity. It turned out that 1 plane glass strip cut down the intensity 10%. So 7 consecutively reflection will cut down the intensity up to roughly 1e-7. BUT each reflections contain 2 reflections out of two surfaces (I used 1mm thick), so total 14 REFLECTIONS. If use just an ultra thin may be a glass membrane carefully with one or two NDs than this can be done and beam profile might still be preserved. Still working……

I emailed Mr. Gunn on 03/04/10, about profiling the beam at higher powers, and waiting for his reply.

Personal tools