User:Nadiezda Fernandez-Oropeza/Notebook/Notebook/2011/07/05: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
(Autocreate 2011/07/05 Entry for User:Nadiezda_Fernandez-Oropeza/Notebook/Notebook) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
== | ==Test of the new tubulin== | ||
* | * | ||
Unfortunately, Cytoskeleton discontinued the Rhodamine-labeled tubulin we had been using. They suggested to use a new one instead: [http://www.cytoskeleton.com/products/tubulins/tl590m.html|New tubulin]. This entry contains the results of the Gliding Motility Assay done with this new tubulin. | |||
===Results=== | |||
Both Assays were performed with the same chemicals, even from the same aliquots, to reduce the possibility of error. | |||
* Old tubulin | |||
The experiment with the old tubulin resulted on an average speed of 934.8067 nm/s. | |||
{| border="0" align="center" valign="bottom" cellpadding=10px | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | [[Image:old.bmp|thumb|center|Old Tubulin|600px]] | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" valign="top" width="300" | | |||
|} | |||
* New tubulin | |||
The experiment with the new tubulin resulted on an average speed of 975.0000 nm/s. | |||
{| border="0" align="center" valign="bottom" cellpadding=10px | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | [[Image:new.bmp|thumb|center|New Tubulin|600px]] | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" valign="top" width="300" | | |||
|} | |||
Qualitatively speaking the only difference found was he brightness of the microtubules on the microscope; the old ones were a little dimmer. | |||
Revision as of 17:56, 29 July 2011
 Project name
|
<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> | ||||
Test of the new tubulinUnfortunately, Cytoskeleton discontinued the Rhodamine-labeled tubulin we had been using. They suggested to use a new one instead: tubulin. This entry contains the results of the Gliding Motility Assay done with this new tubulin. ResultsBoth Assays were performed with the same chemicals, even from the same aliquots, to reduce the possibility of error.
The experiment with the old tubulin resulted on an average speed of 934.8067 nm/s.
The experiment with the new tubulin resulted on an average speed of 975.0000 nm/s. Qualitatively speaking the only difference found was he brightness of the microtubules on the microscope; the old ones were a little dimmer.
| |||||
